About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Hans Zeisel, Book Review of the Death Penalty: A Debate 325 (1985)

handle is hein.death/dthpenb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
Book  Reviews    325


useful illustrations because radical social work is a permanent party of opposition
and discontent, and movements  that are absorbed by society and become part
of a new consensus would not fit the radical social work perspective. She does,
early on, promise that the women's liberation movement will be an exception
(pp. 68-73). That promise is not fulfilled.
  The  radical Left serves a useful function in community life. It is, frequently,
the source of new ideas that, on initial presentation, appear outlandish and
outrageous. Over time, some of these ideas come to be accepted by the larger
community.  We  can find many  examples  in our recent past. And although
most of the political content of radical social work is not well developed, it is
not the political content itself that is repugnant. Rather, it is the clearly expressed
desire to use social service agencies and the workforce of those agencies to
achieve political goals. That objective must be resisted whether the political
goals are of the Right or the Left. Certainly, the greater threat to social services
today comes  from the Right. But the rationale for radical social work, with
all of its self-righteousness and claim to knowing what is good, and true, and
moral, is very much  like the rationale of the moral majority. No, I believe
that the interests of poor, dependent, and deprived people will be better served
if we sustain a social welfare system that is statutorily defined, delivered through
well-run organizations and  bureaucracies, and implemented   by educated
professionals who understand their specialized functions as well as the limits
of their authority. While there is a good deal that is wrong with how the system
now  functions, vast improvements in American  social welfare were attained
between  1935 and  1980; our objective should be to protect those advances
and, after this current neo-conservative government has exhausted its credibility,
improve  upon  them.
  Withorn  notes, though only in passing, that unlike Britain, for example,
the American  social welfare system developed without the strong support of
a labor movement  that is committed to the welfare state. The British welfare
state emerged, she says, from a political process that consistently sharpened
the working-class notion of what it wanted from the state (p. 24). That is an
important observation, because it suggests that it is naive to focus on professional
social workers and program  managers  to reform our  social welfare system.
There  is every evidence that those people are not even a minor obstacle to
reform. Rather, it is the American electorate, Congress, and state legislatures
that must come  to perceive the value of a social welfare system that meets
people's needs with fairness and equity. This is an arduous and difficult task
that requires patience and courage. For some  social workers, it is probably
easier and perhaps more gratifying in the short run to attack social work. But
is it not a pity to see all of that energy and compassion directed against itself?

                                                            Harry  Specht
                                            University of California, Berkeley


The  Death Penalty: A Debate. By Ernest van den Haag  and John P. Conrad.
New  York: Plenum  Publishing Corp., 1983. Pp. xii+ 305. $16.95.

Treatises with pro and con in their title are part of an old tradition. But the
format in which two authors join in defending their respective positions is a
relatively new development, inspired perhaps by our adversary legal system.
  The  authors of The Death Penalty: A Debate apparently agreed on the significant
issues of the problem, then wrote and exchanged position statements, rebuttals,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most