About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (February 19, 2019)

handle is hein.crs/govydh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








                                                                                       Updat

National Park Service: Government Shutdown Issues


Like other federal agencies, the National Park Service
(NPS) has halted most operations during occasional
government shutdowns  resulting from lapses in
appropriations (see CRS reports listed below for more
information). Over the past 25 years, such shutdowns
occurred in late 1995/early 1996, October 2013, early 2018,
and, most recently, from December 22, 2018, to January 25,
2019. Although government shutdowns have affected many
agencies and programs, public and congressional attention
has focused particularly on certain impacts, one of which is
the effect of a shutdown on National Park System units.

Agency  actions during a shutdown are governed by the
Antideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. §§1341-1342, §§1511-1519)
and related guidance, including Circular No. A-I1 from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  One OMB
requirement is for agency heads to develop and maintain
shutdown plans, known as contingency plans, detailing how
each agency is to prepare for and operate during a funding
gap. During recent shutdowns, NPS has executed
successive versions of its contingency plan that have
remained consistent in some ways and varied in others.

For example, during the two most recent shutdowns with
durations of more than one week-the October 2013
shutdown and the December 2018-January 2019
shutdown-NPS executed   contingency plans that were
similar in some respects. Under contingency plans in both
shutdowns, approximately 21,000 NPS employees were
identified for furloughs, and approximately 3,000
employees were required to continue to work to carry out
essential activities. However, the contingency plans
diverged in other areas, such as the extent and types of
visitor access planned for parks in a shutdown, given that
the bulk of NPS staff would be furloughed.

During both shutdowns, Congress and other stakeholders
debated NPS policies on visitor access to parks. Issues have
included, on the one hand, concerns about economic losses
to states, localities, and job sectors dependent on park
tourism when parks are inaccessible, and, on the other,
concerns about damages to park resources and threats to
visitor health and safety when parks are accessible but not
fully staffed. Other topics of debate in NPS shutdowns have
related to the availability of funding outside of annual
discretionary appropriations, which could enable limited
park operations during a lapse in annual appropriations.

Accessibility of NPS Units in Shutdown
NPS's current contingency plan, dated January 2019 and
available at https://www.doi.gov/shutdown, provides that
the NPS will not operate parks during the shutdown.
However, certain park areas will still be accessible to
visitors. Specifically, the plan states that park roads,
lookouts, trails, and open-air memorials will generally
remain accessible to visitors, although no visitor services


ed February 19, 2019


will be provided. By contrast, park facilities or areas that
typically would be locked or secured during non-business
hours are to be closed for the duration of the shutdown.
Park concessioners (privately owned businesses such as
restaurants and hotels in parks) may continue operations at
the discretion of park superintendents.

No official reports are available on the extent of park unit
closures under this plan in the December 2018-January
2019 shutdown. Because some parks consist solely of
buildings and/or other lockable areas, some units were
entirely closed. One estimate suggested that roughly one-
third of the 418 National Park System units may have fallen
into this category (although certain units operated with
mandatory appropriations; see below). The majority of
parks-including well-known  units such as Yellowstone
National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, Yosemite
National Park, the Statue of Liberty National Memorial, and
the National Mall in Washington, DC-remained at least
partially accessible to visitors during the shutdown, with
varying levels of services and law enforcement.

During the December 2018-January 2019 shutdown, issues
were reported in some of the park units that remained
accessible. These included trash buildups, restroom waste
problems, and accidental and intentional damage to natural
resources, among others. The NPS contingency plan
provides that if visitor access becomes a safety, health or
resource protection issue (weather, road conditions,
resource damage, garbage build-up to the extent that it
endangers human health or wildlife, etc.), the area must be
closed. Some parks, and areas within parks, were closed
for these reasons as the shutdown continued.

The general accessibility of most national park units during
the most recent shutdown differed from the overall NPS
approach in the shutdown of October 2013, when all parks
were closed to public visitation and use. To implement
the closures, NPS required all visitors to leave the parks.
All concessions and commercial visitor services were
closed (although certain concessioners negotiated with NPS
to reopen during the shutdown). Where possible, park roads
were closed and access was denied. According to a 2014
NPS  report, the 16-day shutdown in 2013 resulted in an
overall loss of 7.88 million visits to the parks and a loss of
$414 million in NPS visitor spending in gateway
communities across the country. Similar figures are not
available for the December 2018-January 2019 shutdown.

Funding for Limited Operations
Like some other agencies, NPS has had access to funding
sources outside of annual discretionary appropriations that
have allowed for limited operations during shutdowns. For
example, NPS  contingency plans (e.g., in 2013 and 2019)
have provided for continuation of projects obligated from
funds that are not subject to lapse, such as multi-year


https:/crsreports.congress go

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most