About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (March 29, 2019)

handle is hein.crs/govyba0001 and id is 1 raw text is: ~ Informing the legislative debate since 1914 Updated March 29, 2019 Digital Trade Background The rapid growth of digital technologies in recent years has facilitated economic activity and created new opportunities for U.S. consumers and businesses. For example, consumers today access e-commerce, social media, telemedicine, and other offerings not imagined 30 years ago. Businesses use advanced technology to reach new markets, track global supply chains, analyze big data, and create new products and services. At the same time, new technologies raise new trade policy issues, including the lack of common disciplines to help govern such trade, the emergence of new trade barriers and broader public policy questions about online information. Data and data flows form a pillar of innovation and economic growth. Trade in manufactured goods and agricultural products often depends on cross-border data flows. For example, manufacturers may communicate with global customers and suppliers via the internet. Farmers may use real-time satellite data to optimize the productivity of crops and soil. Digitally delivered service exports also rely on cross-border data flows. In 2017, U.S. exports of information and communication technology (ICT) goods were $146 billion, and ICT services exports were $71 billion. In addition, exports of potential digitally enabled services were $439 billion, comprising over half of U.S. services exports. The volume of global data flows is growing faster than trade or financial flows, and its positive GDP contribution offsets the lower growth rates of trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) (see Figure 1). Figure I. Digital Effects on World GDP (percent) 12%c 10 8 Digital flow Omnflow + outrts) flrnport exprts 2% 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 est. Recession Source: Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Zhiyao Lu, Can Digital Flows Compensate for Lethargic Trade and Investment?, Peterson Institute for International Economics, November 28, 2018. In general, the United States supports an open, interoperable, secure, and reliable internet, including the free flow of online information. However, industry stakeholders raise growing concerns about the rise of digital trade barriers, divergent rules, and national standards around the globe that could impair U.S. digital sales or undermine U.S. technological leadership. Selected Digital Trade Issues Protectionist policies may erect barriers to digital trade, or damage trust in the underlying digital economy, and can result in the fragmentation of the internet or discriminatory trade treatment. As with traditional trade barriers, digital trade constraints can be classified as tariff or nontariff barriers and take many forms (see Text Box). What some policymakers see as protectionist, however, others may view as necessary to safeguard certain domestic policy interests. Prominent trade issues include: Internet Sovereignty. In some nations, the government seeks strict control over digital data within its borders, such as what information people can access online, and how information is shared inside and outside its borders, creating digital trade barriers. For example, firms operating in China experience a variety of barriers, such as censorship (the so-called Great Firewall), requirements to use local standards, and national security reviews; Russian laws ban virtual private networks and require providers of encrypted messaging services to potentially share users' chats. Localization and Cross-Border Data Flow Limits. Organizations seek efficiency and market access by freely moving data across national borders or by using cloud services. Regulators seeking to promote security and personal data privacy, or support domestic firms, may impose mandates for local data storage or use of local partners or inputs, raising costs for foreign firms. A 2017 survey by the U.S. International Trade Commission found that data localization was the most-cited policy measure seen to impede digital trade. For example, the European Union's data protection regulation places limits on the use and cross-border transfer of individuals' personal data. Cybertheft or Forced Technology Transfer. Infringement of intellectual property rights (IPR) or lack of IPR enforcement may limit a company's ability to benefit fully from its innovations and investments, such as trade secrets, proprietary algorithms, or source code. IPR infringement in the digital environment is particularly difficult to quantify but is considered to be significant, potentially exceeding the volume of sales through traditional physical markets or legitimate downloads. Regulatory Issues. Governments may impose requirements deemed overly burdensome by firms and which increase costs, or that favor local firms. Regulations may be applied, for example, in a discriminatory or overly trade-restrictive manner, creating a trade barrier for foreign firms. For example, India has compulsory registration of all ICT goods imports with the national standards agency. https:/crsreports.congress.go,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most