About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (March 20, 2024)

handle is hein.crs/goveore0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 







              Congressional
          R a    esearch Service






Fischer v. United States: Supreme Court to

Consider Federal Obstruction Provision in

Capitol Breach Prosecution



March 20, 2024

On December  13, 2023, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Fischer v. United States, a case
concerning whether a federal obstruction of justice statute covers a defendant's alleged participation in the
breach of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Federal prosecutors allege that Joseph Fischer violated 18
U.S.C. @ 1512(c)(2), which authorizes felony penalties for a person who corruptly ... otherwise obstructs,
influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so. The federal district court held that
the statute did not apply to Fischer's conduct. A divided D.C. Circuit panel reversed, holding that
@ 1512(c)(2) encompasses all forms of obstructive conduct, including violent efforts to stop Congress
from certifying the results of the 2020 presidential election.
At the Supreme Court, the Justices in Fischer will consider whether obstruction for @ 1512(c)(2) purposes
includes acts unrelated to investigations and evidence. The conclusion could have wide-ranging
implications given that the Department of Justice has charged numerous individuals involved in the
Capitol breach with violating this same provision. The holding may also be relevant to the federal
prosecution of former President Trump, who was indicted for conspiring to violate @ 1512(c)(2), among
other statutes (as discussed in another CRS product). This Sidebar provides legal background on
@ 1512(c)(2) and the D.C. Circuit's opinion in Fischer, as well as arguments before the Supreme Court.


Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)

Several of 18 U.S.C. @ 1512's subsections are directed at evidence or witness tampering involving, among
other things, actual or threatened force, deception, or harassment to prevent evidence production.
Congress added @ 1512(c) to the statute-including @ 1512(c)(2)'s provision regarding otherwise
obstructing official proceedings-as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. That law was prompted by
the exposure of Enron's massive accounting fraud and revelations that the company's outside auditor,
Arthur Andersen LLP, had systematically destroyed potentially incriminating documents.



                                                               Congressional Research Service
                                                               https://crsreports.congress.gov
                                                                                   LSB11126

CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most