About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (March 23, 2023)

handle is hein.crs/govekzu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





            Congressional Research Service
            Informinq th  legisIlive deAme sinceo 1914



Labor Enforcement Issues in U.S. FTAs


Background
Labor provisions in free trade agreements (FTAs)-both in
the United States and globally-were first included in the
North American Agreement  on Labor Cooperation
(NAALC),  a side agreement to the 1994 North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).  Since then, U.S.
provisions have evolved from commitments not only to
enforce a country's own domestic labor laws, but also to
adopt and enforce core principles of the International Labor
Organization (ILO). As requested by Congress through
trade promotion authority (TPA), recent U.S. FTAs also
subject labor chapters to the same dispute settlement (DS)
procedures as other FTA obligations, with minor
modifications. Some Members of Congress view strong
labor provisions in U.S. FTAs as an important issue and
have raised concerns over FTA partner compliance with
commitments  and the U.S. record of enforcement. Other
Members  question whether FTAs are appropriate or the
most effective vehicle for addressing the cross-cutting issue
of worker rights. These issues were part of the debate in the
renegotiation of NAFTA as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada
Agreement  (USMCA),  which entered into force in 2020.
Labor standards are not part of World Trade Organization
(WTO)  rules; WTO members  deferred to the ILO as the
competent body to deal with such issues, while denouncing
use of labor standards for protectionist purposes. Limited
progress at the WTO led to labor provisions within FTAs
and in eligibility criteria of trade preferences programs.
U.S. FTAs have set precedents in terms of the scope and
enforceability of labor provisions. An ILO report found as
of 2019, 90 FTAs, or a third of agreements in force
globally, have labor provisions. Unlike U.S. practice, the
majority of these agreements do not subject labor
provisions to DS; they provide a framework for dialogue,
capacity building, and monitoring, rather than link
violations to economic consequences, such as trade
sanctions. In cases where DS is applicable, such
mechanisms  have been rarely invoked; countries largely
aim to solve disputes via cooperative consultations.
Enforcement Mechanisms in U.S. FTAs
The United States has brought complaints over FTA
partners' compliance with labor commitments under the
FTAs  listed below. Among these agreements, provisions
subject to DS procedures and remedies may differ:
  NAALC provisions  were subject to separate dispute
   settlement procedures from those applicable to the main
   NAFTA.   NAALC   aimed to settle labor complaints
   primarily via dialogue and consultations. Full dispute
   procedures, e.g., arbitral panel and limited monetary
   penalties, applied to a limited set of obligations or
   allegations involving: a persistent pattern of failure to
   enforce occupational safety and health, child labor or
   minimum  wage  technical labor standards, where the
   matter is trade-related and covered by mutually


Updated March 23, 2023


   recognized labor laws. Other issues, such as freedom of
   association and the right to organize, were limited to
   ministerial consultations. USMCA DS procedures
   supersede NAALC   for labor disputes (see below).
  Dominican  Republic-Central America  FTA
   (CAFTA-DR) and U.S.-Bahrain FTA labor chapters
   include one provision subject to enforcement-a party
   shall not fail to effectively enforce its labor laws,
   through a sustained or recurring course of action or
   inaction, in a manner affecting trade. Parties may
   impose monetary penalties in limited circumstances.
   Creation of a labor cooperation mechanism, in addition
   to a capacity building mechanism and labor affairs
   council in the case of CAFTA-DR, aimed to oversee
   review and implementation of the labor obligations.
   CAFTA-DR was the   first U.S. FTA to include measures
   in support of labor capacity building.
  U.S.-Peru, U.S.-Colombia FTA  labor chapters reflect
   provisions required by the May 10th Agreement, a
   2007 bipartisan deal between congressional leadership
   and the George W. Bush Administration. It called for:
   an additional enforceable commitment that FTA parties
   adopt and maintain core labor principles of the 1998
   ILO Declaration; and the same DS procedures and
   remedies for FTA labor provisions that applied to FTA
   other obligations. A party alleging a violation of the
   provision on ILO commitments must demonstrate that
   failure to adopt or maintain ILO principles has been in
   a manner affecting trade or investment. Colombia
   agreed in a separate bilateral labor action plan to meet
   certain commitments prior to FTA ratification.
  USMCA replaced   NAFTA   and includes a dedicated
   labor chapter, which largely reflects negotiating
   objectives in the latest version of TPA (TPA-2015,
   which expired 2021). It also imposed commitments that
   go beyond the U.S. FTAs with Peru and Colombia, and
   created a new facility-specific rapid-response labor
   mechanism  for addressing certain worker rights
   violations. Regarding disputes, USMCA shifts the
   burden of proof through a presumption that an alleged
   violation of labor commitments affects trade and
   investment, unless demonstrated otherwise-this
   clarifying language was motivated by the U.S. dispute
   loss against Guatemala (see below). Changes to overall
   USMCA DS provisions   aim to prevent a party from
   blocking the formation of a dispute panel.
Summary of U.S. Labor Disputes
The Office of Trade and Labor Affairs (OTLA) within the
Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) of the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL) receives and reviews
complaints (termed submissions) of alleged violations of
FTA  labor commitments. DOL consults and coordinates
with the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and State
Department on labor enforcement. Per OTLA, a submission

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most