About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (February 24, 2023)

handle is hein.crs/govekrx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Congr ssbona Re earch
infurrninj the   I egs ive drbate sne12


Updated February 24, 2023


Prior Converted Cropland Under the Clean Water Act


For decades, the value of wetlands and efforts to protect
them have been recognized in different ways through
national policies, federal laws, and regulations. The central
federal regulatory program, authorized in Clean Water Act
(CWA)  Section 404 in 1972, requires permits to discharge
dredged or fill material (e.g., sand, soil, excavated material)
into wetlands that are considered waters of the United
States (WOTUS).  Also, the Food Security Act (FSA) of
1985-enacted  on December  23, 1985-included a wetland
conservation provision (Swampbuster) that indirectly
protects wetlands by making producers who farm wetlands
or convert them to agricultural production ineligible for
selected federal farm program benefits. Both FSA and
CWA   Section 404 regulations include exceptions to their
requirements for prior converted cropland (PCC). While
both include exceptions for PCC, determinations are made
under separate authorities and for different programmatic
purposes. This has created confusion for some affected
landowners, who advocate for greater consistency among
PCC  determinations. It also has generated some
congressional interest in aligning the requirements for PCC.

What Is PCC?
The CWA   Section 404 program and Swampbuster
provision require the administering agencies to make
certain determinations about wetland areas, including
whether an area qualifies as PCC. While historically the
agencies defined PCC similarly, the way the agencies have
determined what qualifies as PCC has diverged over time.
Clean  Water  Act
Under the CWA,  discharges of pollutants into WOTUS are
unlawful unless authorized by a permit. Section 404 permits
authorize discharges of dredged or fill material into
WOTUS,   including wetlands (33 U.S.C. §1344). The Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) are responsible for implementing
various aspects of the Section 404 permitting program.
Most routine, ongoing farming activities do not require
CWA   Section 404 permits. CWA Section 404(f) exempts
normal farming, silviculture, and ranching from permitting
requirements. However, if a farming activity is associated
with bringing a WOTUS  into a new use where the flow,
circulation, or reach of that water might be affected (e.g.,
bringing a wetland into agricultural production or
converting an agricultural wetland into a nonwetland area),
that activity would require a permit.
The CWA   does not define or mention PCC explicitly.
However,  CWA  regulations exclude PCC from the
definition of WOTUS and therefore the act's permitting
requirements. In 1990, the Corps issued Regulatory
Guidance Letter 90-07, which created one of the first direct
links to Swampbuster. It clarified that PCC, as defined by
U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) Natural


Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in its 1988
National FSA Manual, is not subject to regulation under
CWA   Section 404. The manual defines PCC as wetlands
that were both manipulated (drained or otherwise
physically altered to remove excess water from the land)
and cropped before 23 December 1985, to the extent that
they no longer exhibit important wetland values.
In 1993, the Corps and EPA codified into regulation the
existing policy that PCC are not WOTUS (58 Federal
Register 45008). In the rule's preamble, the agencies
referenced the definition of PCC from the National FSA
Manual. They also indicated that any PCC that were
abandoned, per the NRCS provisions on abandonment, and
reverted to wetlands could be recaptured and subject to
CWA   regulation. Specifically, per the preamble, PCC that
now  meets wetland criteria is considered to be abandoned
unless: For once in every five years the area has been used
for the production of an agricultural commodity, or the area
has been used and will continue to be used for the
production of an agricultural commodity in a commonly
used rotation with aquaculture, grasses, legumes, or pasture
production. Although the definition and abandonment
criteria were included in the rule's preamble, they were not
included in Corps and EPA regulations.
In 2015, during the Obama Administration, the Corps and
EPA  promulgated the Clean Water Rule (80 Federal
Register 37054), which redefined WOTUS. The rule
maintained the PCC exclusion as it existed in the 1993 rule
and similarly did not define the term or include
abandonment  criteria in the rule itself.
In 2020, during the Trump Administration, the Corps and
EPA  published the Navigable Waters Protection Rule
(NWPR)   to revise the definition of WOTUS (85 Federal
Register 22250). The rule maintained the PCC exclusion,
defined PCC, and clarified abandonment criteria. The
NWPR   defined PCC as any area that, prior to December
23, 1985, was drained or otherwise manipulated for the
purpose, or having the effect, of making production of an
agricultural product possible. PCC would lose its status for
CWA   purposes when it is not used for, or in support of,
agricultural purposes at least once in the immediately
preceding five years and the land reverts to wetland status.
The NWPR   text did not define agricultural purposes for
determining abandonment, but the rule's preamble stated
that agricultural purposes include land use that makes
production of an agricultural product possible, including but
not limited to grazing and haying. The preamble also said
that cropland left idle or fallow for conservation or
agricultural purposes for any period of time remains in
agricultural use and maintains PCC status. The term
agricultural purposes appeared to broaden the exception for
CWA   purposes. In contrast, under the abandonment criteria
in the 1993 rule's preamble, an area was required to be used

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most