About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (July 8, 2022)

handle is hein.crs/goveikr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Con grasslanad Research Service
Informing the legislitive debate since 1914

S

Updated July 8, 2022
Election Security: States' Spending of FY2018 and FY2020
HAVA Payments

Congress has provided funding in response to efforts to
interfere with U.S. elections. The Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141) included $380
million for payments to the 50 states, the District of
Columbia (DC), American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands under the Help America Vote Act of
2002 (HAVA; 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145), for example, and
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-93)
and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103)
provided $425 million and $75 million, respectively, for
HAVA payments to those jurisdictions and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Spending data for FY2022 funding was not yet available as
of tis writing, but this In Focus offers an overview of
recipients' spending of the HAVA funding provided by the
FY2018 and FY2020 consolidated appropriations acts
(generally referred to hereinafter as the FY2018 HAVA
payments and FY2020 HAVA payments). The In Focus
starts by summarizing how recipients initially proposed
using the funds, how the onset of the Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected some of those plans,
and how much of the funding recipients have reported
spending to date. It then introduces some issues related to
the availability of funds and the timing of spending and
reporting.
Information about spending of the FY2018 and FY2020
HAVA payments may be relevant both to Members who
are interested in oversight of the FY2018 and FY2020
funds and to Members who are considering further funding
for similar purposes. It might help inform decisions about
whether to provide additional funding, for example, and, if
so, whether or how to specify conditions for its use.
Initial Spending Plans
Funds for the FY2018 and FY2020 payments were
appropriated under provisions of HAVA that authorized
funding for certain general improvements to election
administration (52 U.S.C. §§20901, 20903-20904). The
explanatory statements accompanying the FY2018 and
FY2020 spending bills highlighted five specific election
security-related uses to which recipients may apply the
funds:
* replacing paperless voting equipment;
* implementing postelection audits;
* addressing cyber vulnerabilities;
* providing election officials with cybersecurity training;
and
* instituting election cybersecurity best practices.

Funding recipients were asked to submit plans for use of the
payments to the agency charged with administering the
funds, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
Much of the planned spending they reported in those initial
submissions was on the specific election security measures
highlighted by the FY2018 and FY2020 explanatory
statements. Some of the proposed spending included
transitioning to voting systems that produce voter-verifiable
paper records, for example, or researching or conducting
postelection audits. Many of the spending plans also
included training-related spending, such as hiring election
security trainers and running tabletop exercises that
simulate real-world security incidents, or spending on
cybersecurity upgrades or best practices, such as conducting
penetration tests of state election systems and acquiring
tools to protect those systems against distributed denial-of-
service (DDoS) or ransomware attacks.
Other spending proposals included plans to fund other types
of election security measures, such as improvements to the
physical security of election board facilities or grants to
county election officials to address physical vulnerabilities.
Some states also proposed spending on activities that may
not be focused specifically on securing elections, such as
conducting general voter outreach, improving polling place
accessibility, or implementing automatic or online voter
registration policies.
Adjustments in Response to C OVI D-9
Some states adjusted their spending plans in response to
COVID-19. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
introduced challenges for the administration of elections in
the 2020 election cycle, such as increased demand for mail
voting and greater difficulty recruiting poll workers for in-
person voting.
Efforts to address such challenges can come with additional
costs. Some election officials had to purchase new
equipment to process the increased volume of mail ballots,
for example, or upgrade their databases to enable voters to
request ballots online; hire more temporary workers to
process mail ballots and ballot requests; buy cleaning
supplies and protective equipment for polling places; or
offer additional poll worker training and voter education.
Congress provided $400 million specifically for COVID-
19-related election expenses in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief,
and Economic Security (CARES) Act (P.L. 116-136), but
the FY2018 and FY2020 HAVA payments could also be
applied to some of the new costs. According to guidance
from the EAC, the FY2018 and FY2020 HAVA funds-as
well as some other funding previously appropriated under
HAVA-could be used to cover certain elections expenses
incurred as a result of the pandemic.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most