About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (May 18, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govediz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: C o g e s o a R esearc S ervU 0 May 18, 2021 Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) Trains: Technical Background, Cost Estimates, and Recent Developments Since the 1990s, the U.S. Department of Transportation has provided funding to support development and construction of a train system operated by magnetic levitation (maglev). Maglev trains use magnetic forces to create a cushion of space between a vehicle and its guideway, reducing friction and permitting top speeds in excess of 300 miles per hour, which are not achievable by conventional wheel-on-rail trains. The high speeds reached by maglev could theoretically shorten some intercity trips to the length of a local transit ride. Maglev trains can travel roughly 50% faster than the fastest high-speed rail trains currently in use abroad and nearly twice the top speed of Amtrak's Acela, currently the fastest passenger train in the United States. At full speed, maglev trains could offer travel times competitive with airline flights at distances of up to 750 miles. At that range, maglev could serve city pairs too far apart to have merited serious consideration for new high-speed rail lines, such as Chicago-Washington, DC (700 miles), or Atlanta-Miami (660 miles). Despite this advantage, maglev technology has seen limited real-world use since its first demonstrations in the 1980s. There is one high-speed maglev line in commercial service today, an express airport shuttle in Shanghai, China. Very short lines using maglev technology but running at much lower speeds are operating in Korea and Japan. A longer intercity line is in early construction stages in Japan, but is not expected to open before the late 2020s, and another has been proposed between Hong Kong and Guangzhou, China. There are two main reasons, often interrelated, that few maglev lines have been built: cost and lack of interoperability. Maglev trains require very straight and level tracks to maintain high speeds. This necessitates extensive viaducts and tunneling, making construction costly. Maglev vehicles are not compatible with conventional rail infrastructure, making it difficult if not impossible for maglev trains to make use of existing terminals and rights-of-way in densely developed city centers. This too could create the need for expensive tunneling projects, or else lead developers to build terminals outside city centers, making it less convenient. Maglev Within U.S.Transportation Policy Federally funded research in maglev technology can be traced back to the 1970s. Since the 1990s, Congress has authorized funding for maglev research and demonstration projects in several surface transportation laws. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) created a maglev program office to be run jointly by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Army Assistant Secretary for Civil Works, and authorized $500 million from the Highway Trust Fund for the program. Much of this funding was never spent. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century of 1998 (TEA-21) then codified a maglev deployment program in law (23 U.S.C. §322), under which seven projects were later identified for further study. TEA-21's successor, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005 (SAFETEA) and its amendments, provided $90 million and authorized two demonstration projects, one east and one west of the Mississippi River. The selected demonstration projects in Las Vegas, NV, and Pittsburgh, PA, never reached construction. SAFETEA funding for the Las Vegas maglev was redirected to a highway project; a Final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in 2010 before the Pennsylvania project was canceled as well. More recent appropriations for maglev research and development have not included the geographic distribution requirements contained in SAFETEA. Congress has appropriated a total of $14 million for maglev research and planning since FY2019. Competing Maglev Technologies Transrapid, the first maglev system to be demonstrated, was developed in Germany, and uses what is known as electromagnetic suspension (EMS). Transrapid vehicles resemble monorails, using vehicles with sides that extend below and beneath a single central structure. Despite having pioneered the technology, Germany has not deployed its own maglev system for commercial use; a 25-mile line from Munich to its airport was canceled in 2008, mainly due to cost concerns. The Shanghai maglev opened in 2002 uses a version of the Transrapid design, and reaches a top speed of 268 miles per hour on its 18-mile trip to Pudong International Airport. Plans to expand the route into a 105- mile intercity line were suspended after a high-speed rail line, compatible with the rest of China's high-speed rail network, opened in 2010. China's proposed Hong Kong- Guangzhou line would use a different technology. SCMaglev (short for superconducting maglev), developed in Japan, uses a technology known as electrodynamic suspension (EDS). SCMaglev trains run on guideways that more closely resemble trenches than monorails, and vehicles ride on a thicker cushion of air than in an EMS system (Figure 1). There is no SCMaglev line in revenue service anywhere in the world. However, a test track is operational in Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan, and is part of the Chuo Shinkansen project that would link Tokyo (though not its central rail station), Nagoya, and eventually Osaka on a new SCMaglev line built almost entirely in underground tunnels. This would create a faster and more ittps://Crsreports.congress.g

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most