About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (March 16, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govecrh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





inf.rr  g- thl giilv dea sr 1 4


0


                                                                                             Updated  March 16, 2021

Section 301: Tariff Exclusions on U.S. Imports from China


In 2018, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) determined,
pursuant to an investigation under Section 301 (Title III
of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§2411-2420), that
China's acts, policies, and practices related to technology
transfer, intellectual property (IP), and innovation are
unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S.
commerce.  To counter them and obtain their elimination,
the Trump  Administration imposed, under Section 301, four
rounds of increased tariffs on approximately two-thirds of
U.S. imports from China. However, to avoid harm to U.S.
interests, the USTR instituted tariff exclusions for certain
U.S. imports that would otherwise be subject to tariffs. This
is the first time that the agency has established an exclusion
request process, and several Members of Congress have
raised concerns about its implementation.
Some  Members   have questioned USTR's  ability to pick
winners and losers through granting or denying requests or
have pushed  for broad tariff relief amid concerns about the
negative impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy. Others, not
wanting to undermine the use of Section 301 to address
China's unfair trade practices, have discouraged the USTR
from granting tariff exclusions at all. The agency
established an exclusion process for each of the four stages
of tariff increases under Section 301-all of which have
now  closed. The USTR's  latest actions in response to the
Coronavirus Disease 2019  (COVID-19)  pandemic  suggest
that new exclusions and extensions might be limited in
scope to medical supplies related to the pandemic, and not
be aimed at providing broader tariff relief.
Background
In August 2017, long-standing concerns over China's
policies on IP, subsidies, technology, and innovation led the
USTR   to launch an investigation-under Section 301-into
those policies and their impact on U.S. stakeholders. The
investigation concluded that four broad policies or practices
justified U.S. action: (1) China's forced technology transfer
requirements, (2) cyber-enabled theft of U.S. IP and trade
secrets, (3) discriminatory and non-market-based licensing
practices, and (4) state-funded strategic acquisition of U.S.
assets. Subsequently, as part of its efforts to pressure China
to change these practices, the United States imposed
additional tariffs, of up to 25%, on certain U.S. imports
from China under  four separate actions (per Lists 1-4).
During the Section 301 notice, hearing, and comment
period on proposed tariff increases, the USTR heard
numerous  U.S. stakeholders who expressed concerns about
how  additional tariffs could affect their businesses, as well
as U.S. consumers. In response, for each Section 301 action
regarding a new list of covered products, the USTR created
a process whereby interested parties could request that a
particular product be excluded from the tariffs, subject to
certain criteria. Title III of the Trade Act of 1974 does not
outline a formal process for exclusions or require the USTR
to establish one. The determination to do so appears to be
solely at the USTR's discretion.


With the COVID-19   pandemic, the agency has prioritized
the review of exclusion requests concerning medical
products, resulting in new exclusions and extensions for
some  personal protective equipment (PPE) in short supply.
Separately, the USTR also requested public comments on
whether to remove additional products covered by any list
that are relevant to the U.S. response to the COVID-19
pandemic. As  a result, it has recently granted new
exclusions for certain medical-care products.
Figure  I. Section 301 Exclusions


Exclusion  Requests
a Granted U Denied

List I


List 2

List 3

List 4


Exclusions Granted
      I-iTSS  Specific
         Sbednsproducts.
       17     716

       4      270


                            46     956

                            32      187

S 000   16,000   24,00    32,000
                               as 10311612021


Source: CRS with information from the Office of the USTR.
Note: Figures may not reflect amendments to product-specific exclusions and
do not include requests submitted on or after March 25, 2020, in response to
85 FR 16987. However, exclusions granted to date and noted here may have
been informed by those requests.
Section 301 Tariff Exclusion Process
The tariff exclusion process enabled interested parties-
including law firms and trade associations-to petition for
an exemption from  the Section 301 tariff increases for
specific imports classified within a 10-digit Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading.
The time window  to submit new exclusion requests is
closed, but the USTR reportedly continues to consider
extensions of exclusions already granted. While the USTR
approved, on average, 35% of new requests under the first
two actions, the approval rates under the third and fourth
actions were 5% and 7%, respectively.
According  to the USTR, all requests are evaluated on a
case-by-case basis. The agency has indicated that, in
determining which requests to grant, it considers the
following: (1) availability of the product in question from
non-Chinese  sources, (2) attempts by the importer to source
the product from the United States or third countries, (3) the
extent to which the imposition of Section 301 tariffs on the
particular product will cause severe economic harm to the
importer or other U.S. interests, and (4) the strategic
importance of the product to Made in China 2025 or other
Chinese industrial programs. Past exclusions also have been
granted for reasons that are thought to include, among
others, U.S. national security interests and demonstrable
economic  hardship from the tariffs for small businesses.


tps://crsreports.con

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most