About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (October 10, 2018)

handle is hein.crs/govebca0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Congressional Research Service
Inforrning the legislative debate since 1914

                                                                           Updated  October 10, 2018


Miscellaneous Tariff Bills (MTI

Background
On September  13, 2018, the President signed the
Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-239), an
Act that provided temporary tariff suspensions and
reductions on more than 1500 products. This legislation
followed the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act
of 2016 (P.L. 114-159) that established a process for
considering these bills.
What  Are MTBs?   Miscellaneous Tariff Bills (MTBs) aim
to temporarily suspend or reduce tariffs on certain imported
products (called duty suspensions). In order to be
considered for inclusion in an MTB, proposed individual
duty suspensions must be noncontroversial (e.g., no
domestic producer or Member objects); revenue-neutral
(forgone tariff revenues of no more than $500,000 per
product); and administrable by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP).
Debate. Many  in Congress support MTBs as a relatively
low-cost method of providing a competitive edge to U.S.
businesses by reducing tariffs on chemicals and other inputs
used to manufacture downstream products, thus making
end-use products more affordable to consumers. However,
the former process by which MTBs were originally
assembled was controversial because it involved
constituents asking individual Members to introduce duty
suspension bills to benefit a constituent's company. These
individual bills were then vetted by the relevant
congressional committees (House Ways and Means and
Senate Finance) for inclusion in a larger package. Some
Members  criticized the transparency of this process, while
others defended it because Members were required to file
disclosure forms listing the beneficiaries of duty
suspensions and affirm that neither they nor their spouses
had any financial interest.
In addition, there were concerns under the former process
that duty suspensions violated the House and Senate ban on
congressionally-directed spending (earmark ban) because
they were limited tariff benefits, defined in House and
Senate rules as tariff reductions benefiting 10 or fewer
entities. Supporters countered that because all enacted duty
suspensions appear in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(HTS), any importer of the subject products could
automatically take advantage of the cost savings.

New MTB Process
To address prior concerns with the process, Congress
enacted legislation reforming the process for vetting MTBs.
The American  Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of
2016, P.L. 114-159, established a process for initiating two
MTBs,  one in 2016 and one in 2019. In order to be included
in an MTB, the same conditions for duty suspensions
applied (noncontroversial, revenue-neutral, and
administrable).


https


   Expanded  ITC  Role. In the previous MTB process, the
   U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), an
   independent agency with a statutory responsibility to assist
   Congress (19 U.S.C. 1332(g)), reviewed bills proposed for
   MTBs,  made recommendations  regarding proper tariff
   classification, calculated tariff amounts, and surveyed
   industries to determine if proposed duty suspensions were
   controversial. In the new procedure, the ITC's role
   expanded to include receiving the petitions for duty
   suspensions or reductions (MTB petitions), collecting
   public feedback, gathering input from other related
   agencies, and reporting findings directly to the appropriate
   congressional committees (House Ways and Means and
   Senate Finance).

   The new  2016 MTB  process began on October 14, 2016,
   with an ITC notice published in the Federal Register asking
   members  of the public who can demonstrate that they are
   potential MTB beneficiaries to submit petitions within 60
   days (closed on December 12, 2016). Late petitions were
   not accepted. The ITC received petitions directly and
   published them on a publicly available website no later than
   30 days after the end of the 60-day period. Over 3,000
   petitions were submitted. After all petitions and relevant
   documentation were posted, the ITC issued a notice
   requesting public comments within 45 days (by mid-
   January 2017). All comments were available to the public
   (see Table 1, MTB Process Timeline in P.L. 114-159,
   below).

   Commerce   Report. In previous MTBs, the Department of
   Commerce   (Commerce)  coordinated the Administration's
   comments  on duty suspensions. Commerce analysts, along
   with ITC, also researched proposed duty suspensions to
   determine the existence of any objecting domestic
   producers. In the new process, Commerce's role remains
   essentially the same, with the addition of a deadline.
   On April 10, 2017, within 90 days after the ITC's
   publication of the MTB petitions, Commerce, in
   conjunction with CBP and other relevant federal agencies,
   submitted a report on each petition to the ITC and the
   congressional committees. The report included, for each
   proposed duty suspension: (1) a determination of whether
   domestic production exists, or if domestic production does
   exist, whether the producer objects to the MTB petition;
   and (2) identification of technical changes to the
   description, if any, necessary for purposes of CBP
   administration.
   ITC  Preliminary Report. The ITC was required to submit
   a preliminary report to the House Ways and Means and
   Senate Finance committees 120 to 150 days following the
   publication date of the MTB petitions (submitted June 9,
   2017). For each petition, the report was required to contain:
   (1) the product's HTS heading or subheading; (2) a
   determination of whether or not domestic production or an
)rts.concross.qov

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most