About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 [1] (January 5, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/goveasu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Congressional Research Service


Updated January 5, 2021


Army Corps of Engineers: Continuing Authorities Programs


The U.S. Army  Corps of Engineers (USACE) undertakes
water resource development projects pursuant to
authorizing statutes and the receipt of appropriations. The
standard process for a USACE project requires two separate
congressional authorizations-one for studying feasibility
and a subsequent one for construction-as well as
appropriations for both (see CRS Report R45185, Army
Corps of Engineers: Water Resource Authorization and
Project Delivery Processes). Additionally, Congress has
granted USACE  programmatic  authorities to undertake
cost-shared projects of limited scope and cost without
requiring project-specific congressional authorization.
These programmatic USACE authorities  are referred to as
Continuing Authorities Programs (CAPs). Congress has
consistently funded USACE  CAPs above the President's
request since FY2013.

Types  of CAP   Projects
Since FY2012, Congress has appropriated funding for CAP
programs, not individual CAP projects. USACE identifies
which CAP  projects it will perform using the CAP
program's appropriations. Purposes of CAP projects may
include reducing damage to life and property from flooding,
reducing erosion in certain circumstances, and protecting
and restoring aquatic ecosystems, among others (see Table
1). CAPs typically are referred to by the section number of
the law in which the CAP was first authorized.

Requesting   a CAP  Project
To initiate a CAP project, a nonfederal sponsor (e.g., a local
government  or nonprofit entity with local government
consent) sends a letter to the appropriate USACE district
describing the water resource problem and requesting
assistance with a project. (Templates for letters are
generally available at USACE district websites.) USACE
determines if there is federal interest to proceed with the
requested project and if the project fits under a CAP
authority.

Project  Process: Feasibility and Construction
CAP  projects consist of a feasibility phase and a design and
implementation phase. The purposes of the feasibility phase
include determining whether there is a federal interest in the
project (e.g., identifying costs and benefits) and identifying
the preferred project alternative. The feasibility phase
involves planning activities, such as development of
alternative plans to achieve project goals, initial design and
cost estimations, environmental impact analyses, and real
estate evaluation. For CAP projects, the design and
implementation phase can immediately follow the
feasibility phase (i.e., without project-specific congressional
authorization), subject to the availability of appropriations.


The design and implementation phase includes the final
design and specifications, real estate acquisition, and
project contracting and physical construction. The
nonfederal sponsor and USACE  sign a project partnership
agreement prior to construction. Upon construction
completion, USACE   transfers the project to the sponsor,
which is responsible for operations, maintenance, and most
repairs and rehabilitation (except for commercial navigation
pursuant to Section 107 CAP, which allows for USACE
operations and maintenance). According to USACE,
pending funding, CAP projects generally take three years
from feasibility phase initiation to construction completion.

Table  I. Selected Continuing Authorities Programs

    CAP         Eligible Activities      Authority

 §14         Streambank erosion and    33 U.S.C. §701 r
             shoreline protection of
             public works and nonprofit
             services
 §103        Hurricane storm damage    33 U.S.C. §426g
             reduction
 §107        Navigation improvement    33 U.S.C. §577
 § I I I     Prevention/mitigation of  33 U.S.C. §426i
             shore damage by federal
             navigation projects
 §204        Regional sediment        33 U.S.C. §2326
             management/beneficial use
             of dredged material
 §205        Flood control (including ice  33 U.S.C. §70 Is
             jam prevention)
 §206        Aquatic ecosystem         33 U.S.C. §2330
             restoration
 §208        Removal of obstructions   33 U.S.C. §701g
             and clearing channels for
             flood control
 § 11 35     Project modifications for 33 U.S.C. §2309a
             improvement of the
             environment
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS).

Nonfederal   Responsibilities
The CAP  authorities, similar to the standard USACE
project authorities, require a nonfederal sponsor to share
project feasibility and construction costs and other
responsibilities, including obtaining real estate interests.
Federal funds pay for the first $100,000 of the feasibility
phase, with additional feasibility costs generally shared
50%  federal and 50% nonfederal. Cost sharing for


ittps://Crsreports.congress.gt

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most