About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (October 7, 2019)

handle is hein.crs/goveaqx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 







           SCongressional                                               ______
           SResearch Service                                                              a






Drug Testing Unemployment Compensation

Applicants & the Fourth Amendment



October 7,   2019

On October 4, 2019, the Department of Labor (DOL) published final regulations to guide states on how to
design and implement drug testing programs in accordance with Section 303 of the Social Security Act.
Congress amended Section 303 in 2012 to clarify that nothing in federal law prevents states from testing
two groups of unemployment compensation (UC) applicants for illicit drug use: (1) those terminated
from employment with [their] most recent employer (as defined under the State law) because of the
unlawful use of controlled substances (hereinafter referred to as the previously terminated group), and
(2) those who are suited to work in an occupation that regularly conducts drug testing (hereinafter
referred to as the regularly tested occupation group). State-implemented UC drug testing programs will
likely evoke constitutional considerations under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against
unreasonable government searches.
This Sidebar begins with a general overview of the Fourth Amendment and then reviews three Supreme
Court opinions addressing the constitutionality of drug testing programs in the employment context, as
well as two lower court cases involving similar state laws that conditioned the receipt of federal benefits
on passing drug tests. The post concludes with an assessment of factors that might affect the
constitutionality of a UC drug testing program in light of the Fourth Amendment. (Additional legal and
policy issues raised by DOL's drug testing regulations are discussed in this CRS report.)

Fourth  Amendment Overview
The Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be free from unreasonable searches and
seizures by the federal government. Although Fourth Amendment protections do not extend to purely
private action, the Supreme Court has held that its protections apply to state and local action through the
Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Governmental conduct generally has been found to
constitute a search for Fourth Amendment purposes where it infringes an expectation of privacy that
society is prepared to consider reasonable. The Court has held on a number of occasions that
government-administered drug tests are searches under the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the
constitutionality of a governmental program that requires an individual to pass a drug test to receive UC
likely would turn on whether the drug test is reasonable under the circumstances.


                                                                Congressional Research Service
                                                                https://crsreports. congress.gov
                                                                                    LSB10354

CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most