About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (December 18, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govdcye0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 










Labor Enforcement Issues in U.S. FTAs


B ackground
Labor provisions in free trade agreements (FTAs) both in
the U.S. and globally were first included in the North
American  Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC),  a
side agreement to the 1994 North American Free Trade
Agreement  (NAFTA).  Since then, U.S. provisions have
evolved from commitments  not just to enforce a country's
own  domestic labor laws, but also to adopt and enforce core
principles of the International Labor Organization (ILO).
As requested by Congress through trade promotion
authority (TPA), recent U.S. FTAs also subject labor
chapters to the same dispute settlement (DS) procedures as
other obligations, although with minor modifications. Some
Members  of Congress view strong labor provisions in U.S.
FTAs  as an important issue and have raised concerns over
FTA  partner compliance with commitments and the U.S.
record of enforcement. These issues were part of the debate
in the renegotiation of NAFTA as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada
Agreement  (USMCA),  which entered into force in 2020.
Labor standards are not part of World Trade Organization
(WTO)  rules; in 1996, members reaffirmed the ILO as the
competent body to deal with labor issues, while denouncing
the use of labor standards for protectionist purposes.
Limited progress at the WTO led several countries to
include labor commitments in FTAs and in the eligibility
criteria of unilateral trade preferences programs.
U.S. FTAs have set precedents both in terms of the scope
and enforceability of labor provisions. An ILO report found
as of 2016, 77 out of 267 FTAs globally included labor
provisions, compared to 21 in 2005. Unlike U.S. practice,
the majority of agreements do not subject labor provisions
to dispute settlement. Most provide a framework for
dialogue, capacity building, and monitoring, rather than link
violations to economic consequences, such as trade
sanctions. In cases where dispute settlement is applicable,
such mechanisms have been rarely invoked; countries
largely aim to solve disputes via cooperative consultations.

          Enfocemnt M cha   ism    inU.S. F   TAs  3
The U.S. has brought complaints over FTA partners'
compliance with labor commitments under five FTAs
listed below. Among these agreements, provisions subject
to DS procedures and remedies may differ:
*  NAALC provisions   were subject to dispute settlement
   procedures separate from those applicable to the main
   NAFTA.   NAALC   aimed to settle labor complaints
   primarily via dialogue and consultations. If
   consultations were unable to resolve a complaint, certain
   issues could be referred to other mechanisms. The full
   spectrum of dispute procedures, including an arbitral
   panel and limited monetary penalties, applied to limited
   set of allegations/obligations involving: a persistent
   pattern of failure to enforce occupational safety and
   health, child labor or minimum wage technical labor


Updated December  18, 2020


   standards, where the matter is trade-related and
   covered by mutually recognized labor laws. Other
   issues, such as freedom of association and the right to
   organize, were limited to ministerial consultations.
   USMCA procedures   supersede NAALC   for any future
   disputes involving North American partners (see below).
  Dominican  Republic-Central  America FTA
   (CAFTA-DR) and U.S.-Bahrain FTA labor chapters
   include one provision subject to enforcement -a party
   shall not fail to effectively enforce its labor laws,
   through a sustained or recurring course of action or
   inaction, in a manner affecting trade. Parties may
   impose monetary penalties in limited circumstances.
   Creation of a labor cooperation mechanism, in addition
   to a capacity building mechanism and labor affairs
   council in the case of CAFTA-DR, were intended to
   oversee review and implementation of the labor
   obligations. CAFTA-DR  was the first U.S. FTA to
   include measures in support of labor capacity building.
  U.S.-Peru, U.S.-Colombia FTA  labor chapters reflect
   provisions required by the May 10th Agreement, a
   2007 bipartisan deal between congressional leadership
   and the George W. Bush Administration. The agreement
   called for: (1) an additional enforceable commitment
   that FTA parties adopt and maintain core labor
   principles of the 1998 ILO Declaration; and (2) the same
   dispute settlement procedures and remedies, including
   recourse to trade sanctions, for FTA labor provisions, as
   applied to other obligations. A party alleging a violation
   of the provision on ILO commitments must demonstrate
   that failure to adopt or maintain ILO principles has been
   in a manner affecting trade or investment. Colombia
   agreed in a separate bilateral labor action plan to meet
   certain commitments prior to FTA ratification.
Many  observers expect additional labor complaints under
USMCA.   It revised NAFTA to include a dedicated labor
chapter and reflects negotiating objectives in the latest
version of TPA (enacted in 2015). USMCA imposed
additional substantive commitments that go beyond the
Peru and Colombia FTAs  and created a new enforcement
mechanism  for labor violations at facilities (see below).


The Office of Trade and Labor Affairs (OTLA) within the
U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of International Labor
Affairs receives and reviews complaints (termed
submissions) of alleged violations of FTA labor
commitments.  The DOL  consults and coordinates with the
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and State Department
on labor enforcement. Per OTLA, a submission must raise
issues relevant to the labor provisions in the NAALC or
FTA  and illustrate a country's failure to comply with its
obligations. If the submission is accepted, OTLA does a
review and issues a public report with its findings and


Mips:------------------.-, g-v

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most