About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (December 02, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govdcso0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








                                                                                            December2, 2020

Google and Competition: Concerns Beyond the DOJ's Lawsuit


On October20, 2020, the Departmentof Justice (DOJ) and
11 state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against Google
LIC  under Section 2of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 2).
The lawsuit alleges that Google unlawfully maintains
monopolies in the markets for general s earch services,
search advertising, and general search text advertising in
the United States through anticompetitive and exclusionary
practices. CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10544, The Go ogle
Antitrust Lawsu it: Initial Observations, by Jay B. Sykes
provides an in-depth discussion of the DOJ lawsuit.

The DOJ  lawsuit suggests structuralrelief-potentially
involving divestitures of specific operations-as part of the
potential remedy forGoogle's alleged anticompetitive
conduct. Because the lawsuit focuses on Google's conduct
in search services and search advertising, any structural
remedies would likely focus on these services. For example,
if the court finds that Google violated Section 2of the
Sherman Act, it could order the separation of Google's
search services and search advertising fromits other
products or only fromspecific products, such as the
company's  mobile operating s ystemAndroid and its
browser Chrome.

Over the last two years, some Members of Congress have
raised broader concerns about Google's conductin markets
other than search services in congressional hearings and in
a report is sued by the House Subcommittee on Antitrust,
Commercial, and AdministrativeLaw, Investigation of
Competition in DigitalMarkets. This In Focus explores
some of these additional competition concerns that may not
be addressedby theDOJ lawsuit.


The DOJ  lawsuit claims that Google unlawfully
monopolizes the markets for search services and search
advertising, but does not make similar claims about its other
lines ofbusiness. Over theyears, Google has become a
major force in several other markets not directly related to
search. For example, according to the report by the House
Subcommittee  on Antitrust, 80% of the navigation app
market is controlled by Google's apps-Google Maps and
W aze.

The report asserts that Google canuse its dominance in one
digital market to gain an advantage and reduce competition
in adjacent and unrelated markets. For example, Google's
video s ervice YouTube generates revenue fromthe adjacent
market ofdigitalvideo ad services and requires advertisers
to use Google's advertising s ervice. Thereportstates that
Google leveraged control overYouTube to foreclose
competition in digitalvideo ad services, in part by
excluding rival ad servers fromhaving access toYouTube.
Dominance  in one digitalmarket could help Google


dominate a different market in the future. For example,
Google's alleged dominance in navigation apps might help
it acquire a commanding position in software for driverless
cars, which may rely on up-to -date mapping to reach their
destinations. To prevent this conduct, the report suggests
that Google and other companies activein digitalmarkets
could be required to divest or erect walls between certain
operations or be prohibited fromentering certain markets.

While these forms of restrictions could increase
competition in some markets, they might simultaneously
reduce it in others. The launch of Google Assistant, which
uses Google's search service to providevoice assistance,
has arguably increasedcompetition in a market in which
Apple's Siri and Amazon's Alexa are majorplayers.
Google's Chrome OS-a   computer operating system-
increased competitionin a market that was previously
dominated by Microsoft's Windows andApple's MacOS.
Restricting Google fromentering digital markets could
make it easier for other firms to dominate those markets.


The House  Subcommittee on Antitrust asserts in its report
that Google has established its positions in severalmarkets
through acquisitions. According to the report, Google has
purchasedwell over 260 companies -a figure that likely
understates the fullbreadth ofGoogle's acquisitions, given
that many ofthe firm's purchases have gone unreported.
The report contends that some of Google's acquisitions
have eliminated actual or potential competitors.

Under federallaw, companies planning a merger or
acquisition that is valued above a certain threshold are
required to file a premergernotificationwith the DOJ and
Federal Trade Commis sion (FTC). However, the DOJ and
FTC  have not blocked any ofGoogle's acquisitions, some
of which may have been too small to meet the threshold for
premerger notification. The DOJ lawsuit does notcite
Google's acquisitions as an aspect ofits alleged
anticompetitive conduct.

Google may be able to decrease and forestall competition
through acquisitions. If the acquisitions involve small or
nascent companies, their value may notmeet the premerger
notification threshold for automatic DOJ or FTC review.
The acquired company may not yet occupy a large enough
share of a product market to trigger competition concerns
that could lead the DOJ or FTC to block the transaction.

Restrictions on Google's ability to acquire existing
businesses could reducecompetitionin some markets while
increasing competition in others. The DOJ lawsuit alleges
that Google used Android to maintain its dominance in
search services and search advertising, in part by making


\
Q

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most