About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (March 3, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govcvzs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: ~* or 101 ' Researh Service Fifth Circuit Holds the Individual Mandate Unconstitutional: Implications for Congress Updated March 3, 2020 Update 312120: On March 2, 2020, the Supreme Court granted review in the Texas litigation. The questions at issue before the Court are: (1) whether the individual and state plaintiffs have standing to challenge the individual mandate; (2) whether the individual mandate, as amended, is constitutional; and (3) whether the individual mandate is severable from the rest of the ACA. Oral arguments in the litigation have not yet been scheduled, but will likely take place nextjall. On December 18, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) issued its decision in Texas v. United Staies on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) requirement for individuals to maintain health insurance (the so-called individual mandate) and the continued validity of the remainder of the Act. The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that Congress lacked the constitutional authority to enact the individual mandate, as amended by the subsequent 2017 tax revision, but declined to resolve a broader issue: what happens now to the ACA's remaining provisions? The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court's decision on this severability question and sent the case back to the district court to explain with precision how particular portions of the ACA as it exists post-2017 rise or fall on the constitutionality of the individual mandate. This Sidebar provides background on Texas; discusses the Fifth Circuit's decision; highlights potential effects of the decision and possible next steps for the case; and identifies legislative options for Congress. Background Enacted in 2010, one of the ACA's central goals was to increase the number and share of Americans who are insured. In addition to sweeping changes to federal private health insurance regulation, income- based subsidies to facilitate the purchase of health insurance, and substantial increases to the scope of Medicaid coverage, the ACA, as originally enacted, also compelled certain individuals to maintain health insurance and imposed financial penalties on those who failed to do so. These latter provisions form what is commonly referred to as the individual mandate. In addition, the ACA includes other provisions covering an array of issues ranging from health care workforce promotion to improving access to innovative medical therapies. Litigation over the constitutionality of the individual mandate is not new. In 2012, the Supreme Court addressed this issue in a landmark case, National Federation of ,ndependent Business ii Sebelius (NFIB). Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov LSB10389 CRS LegA SidebaF Prpred For Meumbers and Comrm ttees of Conress ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most