About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (March 26, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govcnzu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





FF.                  ,      riE-SE '. r h ,.  ,


                                                                                         Updated March 26, 2020

Section 307 and Imports Produced by Forced Labor


Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1307)
prohibits the importation of any product that was mined,
produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced
labor, including forced or indentured child labor. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is charged with
enforcing the prohibition.

      Defining Forced Labor in Section 307
  Forced Labor: All work or service which is exacted from any
  person under the menace of any penalty foi its
  nonperfor mance and for- which the worker does not offer
  himself voluntarily. 19 U.S.C. § 1307; language modeled on
  the ILO Forced Laboi Convention, 1930.

U.S. customs law has contained prohibitions against
importing goods produced by certain categories of labor
since the end of the nineteenth century. Beginning in 1890,
the United States prohibited imports of goods manufactured
with convict labor. In 1930, Congress expanded this
prohibition in Section 307 of the Tariff Act to include any
(not just manufactured) products of forced labor. Although
a few Members of Congress brought up humanitarian
concerns during debate, the central legislative concern was
with protecting domestic producers from competing with
products made with forced labor. As such, Section 307
allowed the admission of products of forced labor if it could
be shown that no comparable product was made in the
United States or the level of domestic production did not
meet domestic demand (consumptive demand provision).
Over the decades, lawmakers and civil society became
increasingly concerned about forced labor in the context of
human trafficking. The Victims of Trafficking and Violence
Prevention Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-386), for example,
included forced labor in its definition of human trafficking.
In 2015, Congress removed the consumptive demand
clause, as part of the Trade Facilitation and Trade
Enforcement Act (reflecting this interest in addressing
human rights abuses in the context of forced labor).
A,,pi,-- ,- of ...   30..7:- ,,,


Any individual who has reason to believe that any class of
merchandise that is being, or is likely to be, imported into
the United States is being produced by forced labor may
communicate that belief to CBP (see Figure 1). As required
by 19 C.F.R. § 12.42, port directors and other principal
customs officers must report such instances to the CBP
Commissioner. Persons outside of CBP may choose to
report to the Commissioner, to any port director, or online.


Upon receipt of such a report, the Commissioner of CBP is
required to initiate an investigation as appears warranted
by the amount and reliability of the submitted information.


If the Commissioner of CBP finds the information
reasonably but not conclusively indicates that imports
may be the product of forced labor, then she or he is to
issue an order to withhold release of such goods (WRO)
pending further instructions. WROs have usually been
issued against specific goods from specific producers.
Figure I. Application of Section 307


.4ArY ina


: -N tiaooi ,  i flte*  gat to n.,
                           _5p ccmmwgiso-


   y           ..L ma>r s xor
                oniest t:~e WC.


andd h oe
        LBP 'c-,z-. non < xv ted


Source: CBP.
An importer has three months to contest a WRO. An
importer contesting a WRO must demonstrate that he or she
has made every reasonable effort to determine both the
source of and the type of labor used to produce the
merchandise and its components. If the importer does not
successfully contest the WRO and does not remove the
merchandise at issue from the United States, CBP is to
seize and destroy it. Beyond publishing the date,
merchandise type, manufacturer, and status of a WRO, CBP
does not generally publish information about specific
detentions, re-exportations, exclusions, or seizures.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement can pursue criminal
investigations of Section 307 violations.
  C   ,e La bor d A~ n *.t: -  R Il c&, d   ks, rg
WROs are one of several congressionally-mandated anti-
human trafficking measures that focus on forced labor in
supply chains. Others include the Department of Labor's
Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor (prepared in
accordance with the Trade and Development Act of 2000,
P.L. 106-200) and List of Goods Produced by Child Labor
or Forced Labor (required by the Trafficking Victims
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005, P.L. 109-164).
These reports contain country profiles and lists of goods
(and source countries) suspected to have been produced by
child or forced labor, but have traditionally been used to
increase awareness rather than to inform CBP actions.


Following its enactment in 1930, Section 307 was rarely
used to block imports. The International Trade Commission
reported that between 1930 and the mid-1980s there were


K~:>


gognpo 'pop\qm    ggmm
g
              , q
'S
a  X
11LULANJILiN,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most