About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (September 23, 2016)

handle is hein.crs/govcevu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 









TPP: Investment Provisions


gognpo              goo
g
              , q
'S
a  X
11LULANJILiN,

    September 23, 2016


The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a proposed free
trade agreement (FTA) among the United States and 11
Asia-Pacific countries that would reduce and eliminate
tariff and non-tariff barriers on goods, services, and
agriculture. TPP also would establish trade rules and
disciplines that expand on commitments at the World Trade
Organization (WTO), such as on investment, and address
new 21s' century issues, such as digital trade and state-
owned enterprises.
In 2015, the United States was the largest source of and
destination for foreign direct investment (FDI). TPP covers
about 20% of U.S. FDI abroad, and includes major U.S.
investment partners, such as Japan and Canada. The United
States has FTAs in force with six TPP countries, all with
investment obligations (Fig. 1). Still, concerns remain over
investment barriers in the TPP region, such as sectoral
restrictions, discriminatory treatment, and local content
requirements.

Figure I. U.S. FTAs with Proposed TPP Partners
        ..                   .  . . . . . . . . ... . . .
                            ... ,..:........
                          .         . . . . . . .  .- .



                 .... ~ ~     ~     ~     .... ............::::::::::::::
              ! ~   ~     ~     ~     . ............. ........:i ... .
              ~..................
                .....~ ~    ~    ~   ~    ~..... .. .NY:::::::::::
                                    t . . . . . . . . ........
                                    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
                                    .   .







          , , ' .,' 4., ', . .. . -'.... . .. ..... ...... '
      A Pi      chate               .
   asss ttid                               .E
   of                                     ...mtha.m













   TInvestmentuis a rs-utigise2adohrchpesi
   TPPals Thddrss invesm. eTPP investmenrulslagl



TPsinvesmethe21 chapte mdefinaea investment broadya


whIle, bualcnteeals wirth inoteicyobecivs
         Investmnt is  crosscuttin.issueand.oter.chaters.i
         TPP als addres invetment.TPP.inestmen.ruleslargel
         mirro the 012 US. moel biatera.invetmenttreat
         (BIT), ut als conta..certa..innoations


Co     n  c  w w P otecki',&,
TPP maintains core investor protections reflecting U.S. law
and found in prior U.S. FTAs, such as obligations for
governments to provide investors with non-discriminatory
treatment, a minimum standard of treatment, and
protections against uncompensated expropriation. Other
protections include a prohibition on imposing performance
requirements as a condition of investment (e.g., local
content requirements) and a requirement for the free
movement of capital. These obligations are subject to
certain general exceptions, such as for prudential and
essential security interests, as well as country-specific
exceptions. TPP also establishes procedures for investors to
take host governments to binding arbitration through
investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) to resolve disputes
over alleged violations by host governments of their
investment obligations.


Clarification of minimum standard of treatment (MST).
TPP requires parties to provide MST in accordance with
applicable customary international law (e.g., due process).
New in TPP is clarification that a party's action or inaction
that may frustrate an investor's expectations is not, on its
own, a breach of the MST, even if loss or damage to the
investment follows. Industry groups argue that the change
narrows investor protections too much, while civil society
groups argue that the scope of protection remains too broad.
Reaffirmation of governments' right to regulate. TPP
carries over language found in prior U.S. FTAs that states,
except in rare circumstances, non-discriminatory regulatory
action by a government does not qualify as indirect
expropriation. In addition, TPP more explicitly states that
nothing in the Investment Chapter shall be construed to
prevent parties from taking action otherwise consistent with
the chapter to pursue environmental, health, or other
regulatory objectives. Such provisions target ongoing
concerns in U.S. investment policy raised by certain
stakeholders, but continue to elicit debate such as about
how to balance investor protections with governments'
right to regulate, particularly in the context of investor-state
arbitration.
Other new features. TPP contains new prohibitions on
performance requirements, including banning requirements
related to the purchase, use, or preferential treatment of a
country's technology. TPP is also the first U.S. FTA to
make explicit that the investment obligations apply to state-
owned enterprises (SOEs). While such issues are a concern
in the TPP region, the provisions also could be relevant to
any future multilateral rules-setting.


.O 'T

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most