About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (July 9, 2014)

handle is hein.crs/govccvr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Mon



Monetary Policy and the Taylor Rule


Some Members of Congress, dissatisfied with the Federal
Reserve's (Fed's) conduct of monetary policy, have looked
for alternatives to the current regime. H.R. 5018 would
trigger congressional and GAO oversight when interest
rates deviated from a Taylor rule. This In Focus provides a
brief description of the Taylor rule and its potential uses.


Normally, the Fed carries out monetary policy primarily by
setting a target for the federal funds rate, the overnight
inter-bank lending rate. The Taylor rule was developed by
economist John Taylor to describe and evaluate the Fed's
interest rate decisions. It is a simple mathematical formula
that, in the best known version, relates interest rate changes
to changes in the inflation rate and the output gap. These
two factors directly relate to the Fed's statutory mandate to
achieve maximum employment and stable prices. The
best known version of this rule is:

    FFR = (R + I) + 0.5 x (output gap) + 0.5 x (I-IT)

where:

        FFR = federal funds rate
        R = equilibrium real interest rate (assumed here to
        equal 2)
        output gap = percent difference between actual
        GDP and potential GDP
        I = inflation rate
        IT = inflation target (assumed here to equal 2)

If actual GDP is equal to potential GDP and inflation is
equal to its target, this rule calls for the federal funds rate to
be 2% above the current inflation rate (because R = 2%).
This is called the neutral interest rate, at which monetary
policy is neither stimulative nor contractionary.

The goal of achieving maximum employment is represented
by the factor . 5 x (output gap). The output gap is the
difference between actual and potential GDP. Potential
GDP is the level of output that would be produced if all of
the economy's labor and capital resources were being used.
In economic downturns, actual GDP falls below potential
because some resources are idle; likewise, the economy can
temporarily be pushed above a level of output that is
sustainable. In this rule, when the economy is below full
employment, the output gap is expressed as a negative
number, calling for lower interest rates. This Taylor rule
states that when actual GDP is, say, 1% below potential
GDP, the federal funds rate should be 0.5 percentage points
below the neutral rate.


Changes in inflation enter the Taylor rule in two places.
First, the nominal neutral rate rises with inflation (in order
to keep the inflation-adjusted neutral rate constant). Second,
the goal of maintaining price stability is represented by the
factor 0.5 x (I-IT), which states that the FFR should be 0.5
percentage points above the inflation-adjusted neutral rate
for every percentage point that inflation (I) is above its
target (IT), and lowered by the same proportion when
inflation is below its target. Unlike the output gap, the
inflation target can be set at any rate desired. For
illustration, it is set at 2% inflation here, which is the Fed's
longer-term goal for inflation.

While a specific example has been provided here for
illustrative purposes, a Taylor rule could include other
variables, and any of the parameters (R, IT, and the weights
on the output gap and inflation) could be set at any level.
How Ae. CN   N                   u     4.' nk U sed
Taylor rules are currently used in economic analysis to
explain the Fed's past actions or to offer a baseline in an
evaluation of what the Fed has done or should do in the
future. A Taylor rule (although with different parameters
from this example) has been demonstrated to track actual
policy relatively well for the period lasting from after
inflation declined in the 1980s to the beginning of the
financial crisis in 2007. Thus, it can be used in an economic
model (which offers a simplified version of the actual
economy) to represent the Fed's decisions under normal
economic conditions.

A limitation of the Taylor rule is that it was designed only
to be used with the FFR, which was the Fed's primary
monetary policy instrument from roughly the early 1990s to
late 2008. Since December 2008, the Fed has not used the
FFR as its primary policy tool because the FFR has been at
the zero lower boundit has been set near zero, and thus
cannot be lowered further. Instead, the Fed has created new
policy tools to stimulate the economy. The Taylor rule
cannot make policy prescriptions at the zero lower bound-
different combinations of deflation (falling prices) and
output gaps would prescribe a negative federal funds rate
under the Taylor rule, but that prescription would not be
actionable. The Taylor rule was devised at a time when
interest rates had never fallen to the zero bound before, and
it arguably seemed reasonable at the time to assume that the
rule would not need to cover this contingency.



Economists and policy analysts have debated whether
basing monetary policy on a Taylor rule would lead to
better economic outcomes than the status quo.
Currently, Congress has granted the Fed broad


July 9, 2014


.O 'T


gognpo               goo
g
               , q
's
a  X
11LULANJILiN,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most