About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (December 6, 2016)

handle is hein.crs/govcbzu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




01;0       ,                     riE SE.,., ,    ,. ,- , ,


                                                                                        Updated December 6, 2016
Environmental Provisions in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)


Linkages between trade and environmental protection have
long been a concern to some U.S. policymakers and
stakeholders. The central question is whether trade
liberalization (i.e., the removal of barriers on the free
exchange of goods and services between nations) advances
shared economic and environmental goals. Some observers
argue that economic expansion brought on by trade
liberalization adversely impacts the environment. Among
other concerns, they contend that for developing countries,
international competition may lead them to adopt less
stringent environmental standards or to engage in more
polluting activities. Thus, they claim that environmental
provisions are necessary in trade agreements to help raise or
maintain international standards and protect U.S. businesses
and workers from perceived unfair competition. Other
policymakers and stakeholders believe that trade
liberalization and environmental protection can be mutually
supportive. They argue that while economic growth may
adversely impact the environment during the initial stages
of industrialization, it can also provide resources to mitigate
such effects as countries develop. They also argue that trade
liberalization can support U.S. environmental goals through
the elimination of tariffs on environmental goods, and the
reduction of trade-distorting subsidies.

Trade-related environmental provisions in U.S. FTAs were
first introduced in the North American Free Trade
Agreement of 1994 (NAFTA), Through the years, they
have moved from side agreements to integral chapters
within FTA texts, and increasingly have incorporated
cooperation and dispute settlement (DS) mechanisms.
President George H.W. Bush instituted the first
environmental assessment of a trade agreement with
NAFTA in 1992, and President Clinton formalized the
practice by executive order in 1999. In the Trade Act of
2002 (P.L. 107-210), Congress included environmental
provisions as a principal trade negotiating objective in
renewing the President's Trade Promotion Authority (TPA)
(previously known as fast-track) legislation. Since then, the
United States has been at the forefront of using trade
agreements to promote core environmental protections.
Additional negotiating objectives were incorporated into the
Bipartisan Comprehensive Trade Priorities Act (TPA)(P.L.
114-26), enacted into law on June 29, 2015. Environmental
provisions in the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
and the potential Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership (T-TIP) are currently under debate.

     T~h\ GATI T ,n d he W'TI0
Mechanisms to address environmental protection have been
a part of international trade agreements since the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was signed in
1947. While the GATT does not contain affirmative
environmental commitments, Article XX lays out a number


of general exceptions to its provisions-including
exceptions for natural resources and protection of human,
animal, or plant life, and public health-that could allow
for environmental policy measures. Since its establishment
in 1995, the World Trade Organization (WTO)-the
successor to GATT-has addressed environmental issues
through its dispute settlement system and through Doha
Round negotiations concerning the relationship between
existing WTO rules and international environmental
treaties, known as multilateral environmental agreements
(MEAs). While there has been much focus on the GATT
and WTO dispute settlement systems, there have been only
nine Article XX cases on environmental issues to date.

In addition to the WTO's Doha Round, a plurilateral group
of WTO members is negotiating the elimination of tariffs
on environmental goods such as wind turbines or solar
panels. Further, the reduction or elimination of fishing
and/or fossil fuel subsidies is being negotiated in the WTO,
G-20, and U.S. free trade agreements.

Current Key Environmental Provisions in U.S. FTAs.
A party shall:
*   Not fail to effectively enforce its environmental laws in a
    manner affecting trade and investment.
*   Not waive or derogate from environmental laws to
    promote trade or investment.
*   Fulfill obligations under certain multilateral environmental
    agreements (MEAs).
*   Develop mechanisms to enhance environmental
    performance.
*   Retain the right to exercise the reasonable or bona fide
    exercise of discretion in enforcement.
Other provisions include:
*   Enforceable dispute settlement and consultations.
*   Cooperation and trade capacity building.
*   Environmental Affairs Council.
Source: CRS.


Although the WTO has played an important role in global
environmental discussions, bilateral and regional FTAs
have also impacted environmental policies. FTAs
commonly include more detailed provisions than the WTO
on trade-related issues such as the environment. A brief
evolution of these provisions is outlined below.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
The first U.S. bilateral FTAs-with Israel (1985) and
Canada (1988)-did not contain environmental provisions.
NAFTA (1994, with Canada and Mexico), however,
included a list of MEAs whose provisions generally would


.O 'T


         p\w -- , gnom goo
mppm qq\
a              , q
'S              I
11LIANJILiN,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most