About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (March 2, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govcamz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





      , .      '                      iE SE .r , i ,




Labor Enforcement Issues in U.S. FTAs


Labor provisions in free trade agreements (FTAs) both in
the U.S. and globally were first included in the North
American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC), the
side agreement to the 1994 North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA). Since then, provisions have evolved
from commitments not just to enforce a country's own
domestic labor laws, but also to adopt and enforce core
principles of the International Labor Organization (ILO).
As requested by Congress through trade promotion
authority (TPA), recent U.S. FTAs also subject labor
chapters to the same dispute settlement (DS) procedures as
other obligations, although with minor modifications. Some
Members of Congress view strong labor provisions in U.S.
FTAs as an important issue and they have raised concerns
over FTA partner compliance with labor commitments and
the U.S. record of enforcement. These issues were part of
the debate over the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership
(TPP) and in the renegotiation of NAFTA as the U.S.-
Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), for which Congress
passed implementing legislation in early 2020.
Labor standards are not part of World Trade Organization
(WTO) rules; in 1996, members reaffirmed the ILO as the
competent body to deal with labor issues, while denouncing
the use of labor standards for protectionist purposes.
Limited progress at the WTO led several countries to
include labor commitments in FTAs and in the eligibility
criteria of unilateral trade preferences programs.
U.S. FTAs have set precedents both in terms of the scope
and enforceability of labor provisions. An ILO report found
as of 2016, 77 out of 267 FTAs globally included labor
provisions, compared to 21 in 2005. Unlike U.S. practice,
the majority of agreements do not subject labor provisions
to dispute settlement. Most provide a framework for
dialogue, capacity building, and monitoring, rather than link
violations to economic consequences, such as trade
sanctions. In cases where dispute settlement is applicable,
such mechanisms have been rarely invoked; countries
largely aim to solve disputes via cooperative consultations.


The U.S. has brought complaints over FTA partners'
compliance with labor commitments under five FTAs listed
below. Among these agreements, provisions subject to
dispute resolution procedures and remedies may differ:
   NAALC provisions were subject to dispute settlement
   procedures separate from those applicable to the main
   NAFTA. NAALC aimed to settle labor complaints
   primarily via dialogue and consultations. If
   consultations were unable to resolve a complaint, certain
   issues could be referred to other mechanisms. The full
   spectrum of dispute procedures, including an arbitral
   panel and limited monetary penalties, applied to limited
   set of allegations/obligations involving: a persistent


                - mmm, go
mppm qq\
               , q
               I
aM
11LIANJILiN,

Updated March 2, 2020


   pattern of failure to enforce occupational safety and
   health, child labor or minimum wage technical labor
   standards, where the matter is trade-related and
   covered by mutually recognized labor laws. Other
   issues, such as freedom of association and the right to
   organize, were limited to ministerial consultations.
* Dominican Republic-Central America FTA
   (CAFTA-DR) and U.S.-Bahrain FTA labor chapters
   include one provision subject to enforcement a party
   shall not fail to effectively enforce its labor laws,
   through a sustained or recurring course of action or
   inaction, in a manner affecting trade. Parties may
   impose monetary penalties in limited circumstances.
   Creation of a labor cooperation mechanism, in addition
   to a capacity building mechanism and labor affairs
   council in the case of CAFTA-DR, were intended to
   oversee review and implementation of the labor
   obligations. CAFTA-DR was the first U.S. FTA to
   include measures in support of labor capacity building.
* U.S.-Peru, U.S.-Colombia FTA labor chapters reflect
   provisions required by the May 10th Agreement, a
   2007 bipartisan deal between congressional leadership
   and the Bush Administration. The agreement called for:
   (1) an additional enforceable commitment that FTA
   parties adopt and maintain core labor principles of the
   1998 ILO Declaration; and (2) the same dispute
   settlement procedures and remedies, including recourse
   to trade sanctions, for FTA labor provisions, as applied
   to other obligations. A party alleging a violation of the
   provision on ILO commitments must demonstrate that
   failure to adopt or maintain ILO principles has been in
   a manner affecting trade or investment. Colombia
   agreed in a separate bilateral labor action plan to meet
   certain commitments prior to FTA ratification.
Some expect future labor complaints under the USMCA,
which revised NAFTA to include a labor chapter in the
main text, and goes further than the Peru and Colombia
FTAs, reflecting updated negotiating objectives within the
latest version of TPA (enacted in 2015), by imposing
additional substantive commitments and creating a new
enforcement mechanism for facility-specific violations of
labor rights (see below). Notably, USMCA shifts the
burden of proof by creating a rebuttable presumption that
an alleged violation of labor commitments affects trade and
investment, unless demonstrated otherwise.


The Office of Trade and Labor Affairs (OTLA) within the
U.S. Department of Labor receives and reviews complaints
(termed submissions) of alleged violations of FTA labor
commitments. The DOL consults and coordinates with the
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and State Department
on labor enforcement. Per OTLA, a submission must raise
issues relevant to the labor provisions in the NAALC or
FTA and illustrate a country's failure to comply with its


K~:>

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most