About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (June 24, 2019)

handle is hein.crs/govbacv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 










Debates over Currency Manipulation


Updated June 24, 2019


Overview
Some  Members  of Congress and policy experts argue that
U.S. companies and jobs have been adversely affected by
the exchange rate policies adopted by other countries. They
allege that these countries use policies to manipulate the
value of their currency in order to gain an unfair trade
advantage against other countries, including the United
States.

Other analysts are more skeptical about currency
manipulation being a significant problem. They raise
questions about whether government policies have long-
term effects on exchange rates, whether it is possible to
differentiate between manipulation and legitimate central
bank activities, and the net effect of currency manipulation
on the U.S. economy.

Background
What  is currency manipulation? At the heart of current
debates is whether or not other countries are using policies
to intentionally weaken the value of their currency, or
sustain a weak currency, to gain a trade advantage. A weak
currency makes exports less expensive to foreigners, which
can spur exports and job creation in the export sector.

Can  governments  weaken  their currencies? Economists
disagree about whether government policies have long-term
effects on exchange rates, particularly for countries with
floating exchange rates. However, some economists believe
that, at least in the short run, some government policies can
impact the value of currencies. One policy is buying and
selling domestic and foreign currencies (intervening) in
foreign exchange markets. A number of economic policies,
including monetary, fiscal, and structural policies, may also
affect exchange rate levels but they may be pursued for
policy goals unrelated to trade. For example, a central bank
may  adopt expansionary monetary policies to combat a
domestic recession, while having the simultaneous effect of
depreciating the currency.

What  is the impact on the United States? If another
country weakens its currency relative to the dollar, U.S.
exports to the country may be more expensive and U.S.
imports from the country may be less expensive. As a
result, U.S. exports to the country may be negatively
affected, and U.S. producers of import-sensitive goods may
find it hard to compete with imports from the country. On
the other hand, U.S. consumers who buy imports and U.S.
businesses that rely on inputs from overseas may benefit,
because goods from the country may be less expensive.

Which  countries are accused of currency manipulation?
There is debate over which countries, if any, are
manipulating their exchange rates. Part of the debate is
which, if any, government policies should count as currency

                                           https://crsrepo


   manipulation. Economists have also developed a number of
   models to estimate whether the actual value of a currency
   differs from what it should be according to economic
   fundamentals. Various models produce different results.

   According to a 2017 study by economists at the Peterson
   Institute for International Economics, currency
   manipulation has largely been in remission since 2014. The
   Treasury Department since President Trump took office has
   not formally found any country to be manipulating its
   currency in its semiannual report to Congress. China's
   interventions in foreign exchange markets to limit
   appreciation of its currency largely occurred between 2003
   and 2014. However, recent depreciation of China's
   currency, as well as a relatively strong U.S. dollar (Figure
   1), may be fueling Administration concerns. A strong dollar
   makes it more difficult for some U.S. firms to compete
   against foreign producers.

   Figure I. Nominal  Broad Dollar Index





     105
     100

     90
     85
     8G
          o   1-   N    M   t    U    0        0   C)
          N q        N    N      N~   N   N    N    N

   Source: Federal Reserve.
   Notes: An increase on the graph represents an appreciation of the
   U.S. dollar against other currencies.

   Existing   Policy   Frameworks
   Multilaterally, members of the International Monetary Fund
   (IMF) have committed to refraining from manipulating
   their exchange rates to gain an unfair trade advantage.
   Violators could face loss of IMF funding, suspension of
   voting rights or, ultimately, expulsion from the IMF. The
   IMF has never publicly labeled a country as a currency
   manipulator. Some argue that commitments made in the
   context of the World Trade Organization (WTO) are
   relevant to disagreements over exchange rates, although this
   view is debated. Exchange rates are also discussed by the
   G-7 and the G-20, where commitments to refrain from
   currency manipulation are now routinely emphasized.

   Provisions in U.S. law also address currency manipulation.
   The 1988 Trade Act (P.L. 100-418) requires the Treasury
   Department to analyze semiannually the exchange rate
   policies of major U.S. trading partners. If some countries
rts.congressgov

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most