About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

290 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 1 (1953)

handle is hein.cow/anamacp0290 and id is 1 raw text is: Atomic Energy and the Democratic Process

By ROBERT A. DAHL

T O say that we have not yet discov-
ered how to deal with atomic en-
ergy through democratic political proc-
esses may at first glance seem to be one
of those pieces of dramatic and mis-
leading hyperbole that are regularly in-
voked, unfortunately, in the attempt to
discuss the social impacts of this new
force. After all, the arrival of nuclear
weapons, and in the United States the
creation of a gigantic government-con-
trolled industry to produce them, have
assuredly not pushed us to the edge of
dictatorship. Despite the shrill warnings
of science fiction, the small group of
Americans who initially make our atomic
energy policies are quite patently not
imposing a tyrannical will on a terrified
public. What is more, as Senator Jack-
son shows in this volume, a body of
popularly elected laymen in the Joint
Congressional Committee on Atomic En-
ergy exercises control over policy to a
degree that is probably unique in con-
gressional-executive relations.
Yet as a plain statement of fact, the
proposition is scarcely debatable: the
political processes of democracy do not
operate effectively with respect to atomic
energy policy.
To say so much is not to pass a moral
or practical judgment on the fact. By
the standards of anyone save a doc-
trinaire and utopian partisan of de-
mocracy, the political solution we have
arrived at for atomic energy policy
quite possibly may be preferable to a
larger degree of democratic control.
The difficulty is that so few of us can
appraise the consequences of the vari-
ous alternatives.

THE DISTINCTIVE FEATURES
As with so many other aspects of
atomic energy, it is as easy to exagger-
ate the difference as to underestimate it.
Once we get outside the models of the
democratic theorists to the political life
of the real world, we discover that
polities which we in the West call demo-
cratic are in fact systems in which most
policy is determined by a relatively
small number of people. These people,
leaders of one sort or another, act within
ill-defined boundaries set by a general
public-really a network of publics-
that is passive and acquiescent except
when its boundaries of tolerance are in-
vaded, or at least when some leaders
convince the public that this is so.
Many individuals normally in the gen-
eral public move into and out of
the decision-influencing group whenever
some particular type of policy is in-
volved-farm prices, say, or labor legis-
lation or copper imports or a local har-
bor improvement. At this point hitherto
inactive individuals may become leaders
in pressing for some line of policy, or-
more likely-attentive citizens who
follow this particular series of events
with close attention and even some
readiness to act in various politically
relevant ways.
Hence when we say that the political
processes of democracy do not operate
with respect to atomic energy policy,
we refer not to the fact that broadly
dispersed popular control is lacking, but
rather to these distinguishing charac-
teristics: (1) Some of the consequences
of atomic energy policy are of incal-
culable importance to the most highly
1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most