About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Statement of Peter R. Orszag, Director, Increasing the Value of Federal Spending on Health Care, before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives [i] (July 2008)

handle is hein.congrec/cbo9338 and id is 1 raw text is: Chairman Spratt, Ranking Member Ryan, and Members of the Committee, thank
you for giving me the opportunity to discuss opportunities for increasing the efficiency
of health care. The rate of growth in health care costs is the most important factor
influencing the federal government's long-term fiscal situation. The Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) projects that, without any changes in federal law, total spending
on health care will rise from 16 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007
to 25 percent in 2025 and 49 percent in 2082, and net federal spending on Medicare
and Medicaid will rise from 4 percent of GDP to almost 20 percent over the same
period.' Many of the other factors that will play a key role in determining future fiscal
conditions-including the actuarial deficit in Social Security and a decision about
extending the 2001 and 2003 tax legislation past its scheduled expiration in 2010-
pale by comparison over the long term with the impact and challenges of containing
growth in the cost of federal health insurance programs.
Both demographic changes and rising health care costs per beneficiary contribute sig-
nificantly to our future fiscal challenges, but it seems clear that the latter is more
important over the long term. To be sure, among adults, health care spending gener-
ally increases with age. As the number of elderly people increases over time, health
care spending naturally will grow. Yet the dominance of cost growth in health care
over the effect of demographic changes can be seen by comparing the trajectory of
cost growth in Social Security with that in Medicare and Medicaid over time (see
Figure 1).
Given the nature of the programs, a demographic shift will have similar effects on the
costs of Social Security and of Medicare and Medicaid. In the next 10 to 20 years, the
projected growth of spending in those programs differs but perhaps not all that dra-
matically, which suggests that demographics account for a relatively large share of the
increase during that period. Beyond that point, however, Social Security spending lev-
els off as a share of GDP, while spending on Medicare and Medicaid is projected to
grow much more rapidly. Some have interpreted that relative dominance of cost
growth per beneficiary in influencing our fiscal future as an excuse for not addressing
the higher costs associated with an aging population. That reasoning makes little sense
to me; it is a non sequitur. To say that problem A is bigger than problem B is not to
say that problem B does not exist or should not be addressed.
My statement briefly explores evidence of the potentially substantial inefficiencies in
health care and then discusses a few pathways to reducing them.
Evidence of Inefficiency
Embedded in the nation's long-term fiscal challenge is a substantial opportunity: to
reduce health care costs without adversely affecting health outcomes. Perhaps the
1. Congressional Budget Office, The Long- Terrn Outlook for Health Care Spending (November 2007).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most