About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2007 Annual Survey: Recent Developments in Sports Law 341 (2007)

handle is hein.blasports/ansrvds0018 and id is 1 raw text is: 











                              SURVEY

                 2007 ANNUAL SURVEY:
 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SPORTS LAW


                             INTRODUCTION

    This survey reports on sports-related cases that were decided between
January 1 and December   31, 2007.  The survey is not intended to include
every case related to sports law decided in the past year; instead, it provides a
summary  of some  of the more important and interesting cases. Ideally, the
survey will enlighten the reader as to the depth and breadth of the law and its
application within the sports context. For the ease of the reader, the survey is
divided into subsections based on particular areas of sports law.1

                         ADMINISTRATIVE   LAW


                 Ohton v. Bd. of Tr. of the Cal. State Univ.2

    David Ohton, a strength and conditioning coach for the San Diego State
University football team, which is a California State University (CSU) football
team, filed an internal administrative complaint alleging that head football
coach Tom   Craft and other members  of the athletic department retaliated
against him because he reported to a university auditor information that was
critical of various athletic department personnel and practices. The action was
brought under the California Whistleblower Protection Act (CWPA). Under a
promise of confidentiality, Ohton provided the auditor with a 103-page report
chronicling violations of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)
rules, among other things. Somehow,  Craft managed  to get a copy of the
report and circulated it to various members of the athletic department staff.
After the distribution of the report, Ohton was no longer invited to help run
football camps, was replaced as football strength and conditioning coach, was
barred from contact with football players, and was not invited to the annual
football booster dinner. The superior court dismissed his claims of retaliation


   1. The cases are listed in alphabetical order within each section.
   2. 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 111 (Ct. App. 2007).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most