About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

37 ILR 1 (2010)

handle is hein.amindian/indlr0037 and id is 1 raw text is: 
January 2010                             Celebrating 37 Years of Service                           Volume 37, No. 1


Month in Brief


                  UNITED STATES
               COURTS OF APPEALS

                   FIFTH CIRCUIT
Criminal Jurisdiction and Procedure
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit finds that the
district court erred in sua sponte transferring a case from the
Del Rio Division of the Western District of Texas to the Waco
Division and thus vacates the defendants' convictions for
embezzlement of funds from the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of
Texas and remands for a new trial in a venue determined in
accordance with Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Pro-
cedure. United States v. Garza, Jr., et al., No. 08-50186,37 Indian
L. Rep. 2001 (5th Cir., Jan. 5,2010).

                  NINTH CIRCUIT
Indian Civil Rights Act: Habeas Corpus
Tribal Membership: Enrollment
Tribal Membership: Power of Revocation
  In an action challenging their disenrollment from the
Pechanga Band of the Luiseno Mission Indians in a petition for
habeas corpus under the Indian Civil Rights Act, the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concludes that it lacks subject
matter jurisdiction to consider the claim because the appellants
were not detained and holds that the appellants cannot bring
their claims under 25 U.S.C. § 1303 and thus affirms the district
court. Jeffredo, et al. v. Macarro, et al., No. 08-55037, 37 Indian
L. Rep. 2003 (9th Cir., Dec. 22, 2009).
Hunting, Fishing, Trapping and Gathering Rights
Treaties with United States
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms the
district court's ruling in a sub-proceeding of US. v. Washington,
384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), in which the district court
concluded that the judge in the action, Judge Boldt, did not
intend to include the Saratoga Passage and Skagit Bay in the
Suquamish Tribe's usual and accustomed fishing grounds for
Puget Sound Tribes. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, et al. v. Wash-
ington, et al., No. 07-35061, 37 Indian L. Rep. 2009 (9th Cir., Jan.
5,2010).


Federal Acknowledgment
Hunting, Fishing, Trapping and Gathering Rights
Treaties with United States
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms the
district court's judgment denying the Rule 60(b) motion of the
Samish Tribe for relief from the judgment in United States v.
Washington, 476 F. Supp. 1101, 1106 (W.D. Wash. 1979), affd 641
E 2d. 1368 (9th Cir. 1981), concluding that the federal recogni-
tion of a tribe has no effect on the establishment of treaty fish-
ing rights that are the subject of the action, and overrules its
holding in United States v. Washington, 394 F.3d. 1152, 1161 (9th
Cir. 2005). United States v. Washington, et al., No. 08-35794, 37
Indian L. Rep. 2011 (9th Cir., Dec. 11, 2009).


                FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Civil Jurisdiction and Procedure
Trust Funds
Trust Responsibility, United States
  Adopting the fiduciary exception in tribal trust cases and
denying the petition for mandamus, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit holds that the United States cannot deny
an Indian tribe's request to discover communications between
the United States and its attorneys based on attomey-client priv-
ilege when those communications concern management of an
Indian trust and the United States has not claimed that the gov-
ernment or its attorneys considered a specific competing interest
in those communications. In re United States, Misc. Docket No.
908,37 Indian L. Rep. 2016 (Fed. Cir., Dec. 30,2009).


37 ILR 1


L                                                                                                                      I


Copyright © 2010 by the American Indian Lawyer Training Program, Inc.
Rights of redistribution or reproduction belong to the copyright owner.
                         ISSN-0097-1154


INDIAN LAW REPORTER
      A PUBLICATION OFTHE AMERICAN INDIAN LAWYER TRAINING PROGRAM, INC

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most