About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

36 ILR 1 (2009)

handle is hein.amindian/indlr0036 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                    INDIAN LAW REPORTER
                                          A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN LAWYER TRAINING PROGRAM, INC


January 2009                             Celebrating 36 Years of Service                            Volume 36, No. 1


Month in Brief


                  UNITED STATES
               COURTS OF APPEALS

                 SECOND CIRCUIT
Federal Authority over Indian Affairs: Loans
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirms the
district court's judgment finding that the decision of the Farm
Service Agency (FSA), of the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
that the appellants did not qualify for debt restructuring was
not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion, nor did the
FSA commit the alleged procedural violations or engage in dis-
crimination. Sheehy, et al. v. Johanns, et al., No. 07-1732-cv, 36
Indian L. Rep. 2001 (2d Cir., Oct. 31,2008).

                 EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Voting Rights
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit holds that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in adopting plain-
tiffs' Plan C at-large cumulative voting scheme in a challenge to
a redistricting plan on the grounds that the redistricting plan
diluted the voting strength of Native Americans. Cottier, et al. v.
City of Martin, et al., No. 07-1628, 36 Indian L. Rep. 2001 (8th
Cir., Dec. 16,2008).

                  NINTH CIRCUIT
Taxation
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit finds that the
legal incidence of the California sales tax falls upon the non-
Indian subcontractor, affirming the district court's holding that
the tax meets the per se test of the Supreme Court's ruling in
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation, 515 U.S. 450
(1995), but rejecting the district court's conclusion that the pre-
emption test of the Supreme Court's ruling in White Mountain
Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980), invalidates the
state tax, and thus reverses the district court's grant of summary
judgment to the Tribe, and remands for judgment to be entered
in favor of the members of the California State Board of Equal-
ization. Barona Band of Mission Indians, et al. v. Yee, et al, No.
06-55918,36 Indian L. Rep. 2008 (9th Cir., June 18,2008).


Employment
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms the
district court's grant of summary judgment for the Bureau of
Indian Affairs in an action challenging the denial of increased
retirement benefits payable to employees whose duties included
firefighting. Lawrence, et al. v. Department of Interior, et al., No.
06-35448,36 Indian L Rep. 2012 (9th Cir., May 13,2008).
Sovereignty- Sovereign Immunity, Federal
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holds that
the Tucker Act's waiver of the United States' sovereign immu-
nity is limited to suits filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims,
and thus reverses the district court's judgment and remands
with instructions to transfer the action to the Court of Federal
Claims in an action asserting the taking of property by the
Bureau of Indian Affairs. McGuire v. United States, No. 06-
15812,36 Indian L. Rep. 2013 (9th Cir., Dec. 24, 2008).
Environmental Regulation: Clean Water Act
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
National Historic Preservation Act
Religion: Religious Freedom Restoration Act
  In a challenge to a hydropower project relicensing determi-
nation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms the Commis-
sion's finding that the relicensing decision does not substantially
burden the Snoqualmie Tribe's free exercise of religion, holds
that the application of the wrong standard for analyzing Reli-
gious Freedom Restoration Act claims was harmless error, finds
that the Commission was not obligated to consult with the Tribe
because the Tribe was not a federally-recognized tribe at the
time that section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act's consultation requirement had to be met, and holds that
the Commission's amendment of the license order's minimum
instream flow provisions did not conflict with the Washington
State Department of Ecology's water quality certification pur-
suant to the Clean Water Act. Snoqualmie Indian THbe, et al v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al., Nos. 05-72739
and 05-74060,36 Indian L. Rep. 2018 (9th Cir., Oct. 7,2008).


36 ILR 1


Copyright © 2009 by the American Indian Lawyer Training Program, Inc.
Rights of redistribution or reproduction belong to the copyright owner.
                         ISSN-0097-1154

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most