About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 ILR 1 (2004)

handle is hein.amindian/indlr0031 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                   INDIAN LAW REPORTER
                                         A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN LAWYER TRAINING PROGRAM, INC


January 2004                             Celebrating 31 Years of Service                           Volume 31, No. 1



                                                  Month in Brief


                  UNITED STATES
               COURTS OF APPEALS

                 SECOND CIRCUIT
Grave Protection: Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act
  The Second Circuit affirms the district court's grant of sum-
mary iudgment for defendants holding that the plaintiff-appel-
lant failed to show he had standing to bring a claim under the
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act arising
out of the alleged desecration of burial sites located in Hamp-
ton Corners, Groveland, New York. Jacobs, et al. v. Pataki, et at.,
No. J2-7291, unpublished, 31 Indian L. Rep. 2001 (2d Cir., June
18,2j)03)

                 EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Ganii. Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
  The Eighth Circuit finds that the Indian Gaming Regulatory
Act. 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. (IGRA) does not repeal the John-
son Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1171 et seq., and concludes that because the
Lucky Tab II machines operated by the Santee Sioux Tribe are
not prohibited Johnson Act gambling devices and are not pro-
hibited facsimiles under 25 U.S.C. § 2703(7) of IGRA, the Tribe
is not conducting class III gaming in contravention of the fed-
eral court's prior order and thus affirms the district court's judg-
ment. United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, No. 02-
1503,31 Indian L Rep. 2001 (8th Cir., Mar. 20,2003).

                  NINTH CIRCUIT
Hunting, Fishing, Trapping and Gathering Rights
Treaties with United States
  The Ninth Circuit affirms the district court's grant of sum-
mary judgment for defendants finding that the plaintiff failed to
plead facts sufficient to establish that the Snoqualmoo Tribe has
rights under the Point Elliott Treaty or to support a claim that
an Island County Commissioner was involved in any violation
of plaintiffs rights. Posenjak v. Department of Fish & Wildlife
of the State of Washington, et al., No. 02-35737, unpublished, 31
Indiau L. Rep. 2005 (9th Cir., Aug. 20,2003).


                  TENTH CIRCUIT
Allotments
Trust and Restricted Lands
  The Tenth Circuit affirms the district court's grant of-summary
judgment for defendants in an action in which the personal rep-
resentative of her deceased husband's estate sought a declara-
tion that the estate was the equitable owner of two tracts of
restricted Indian lands to which the parents of the deceased hold
legal title. In the Matter of the Estate of Bruner, Bruner v.
Bruner, et al., No. 02-5084, 31 Indian L. Rep. 2006 (10th Cir.,
Aug. 8,2003).
Federal Benefits, Entitlement to
Sovereignty: Sovereign Immunity, Tribal
Tribes: Recognition by United States
  In an action brought by the Dosar Barkus and Bruner Bands
of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma against the United States
challenging denial of benefits provided to other members of the
tribe, the Tenth Circuit holds that the district court did not err
in dismissing the action for failure to join the Seminole Nation
as an indispensable party, and affirms the district court's conclu-
sion that it lacked jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' claims that the
Bureau of Indian Affairs improperly refused to issue Certifi-
cates of Degree of Indian Blood to the members of the plaintiff
bands because plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative
remedies. Davis, et al. v. United States, et al., No. 02-6198, 31
Indian L. Rep. 2008 (10th Cir., Sept. 10, 2003).


                  UNITED STATES
                  DISTRICT COURTS

               DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Tribal Law. Tribal Codes; Motor VehidefErffic
  The district court denies the defendant's motion to recon-
sider in an action in which the Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indi-
ans sought declaratory and injunctive relief seeking to have
tribal motor vehicle registration and titles recognized by the
State of Kansas. Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Wagnon,
et al., No. 99-4136-JAR, 31 Indian L. Rep. 3001 (D. Kan., Oct. 8,
2003).


31 ILR 1


Copyright © 2004 by the American Indian Lawyer Training Program, Inc.
Rights of redistribution or reproduction belong to the copyright owner.
                         ISSN-0097-1154

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most