About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

Case Citations [1] (April 2017 through August 2017)

handle is hein.ali/resfrlus0042 and id is 1 raw text is: 





    FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED

                                  STATES 2D





                                  PART I. JURISDICTION



     CHAPTER   3. RESOLUTION AND AVOIDANCE OF CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION

   TOPIC  1. CONFLICTS  ARISING  FROM   EXISTENCE OF CONCURRENT JURISDICTION
                             TO PRESCRIBE AND ENFORCE

  TITLE  B. EXERCISE  OF  JURISDICTION   INVOLVING INCONSISTENT REQUIREMENTS
                                      OF CONDUCT

  § 40. Limitations on Exercise of Enforcement Jurisdiction

  N.D.Ill.2016. Cit. in cases cit. in sup. and in ftn. Victims and family members of victims brought an
  action pursuant to the Antiterrorism Act and the state-sponsored terrorism exception set forth in the
  Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act against the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Iranian Ministry of
  Information, seeking recovery for injuries plaintiffs suffered as a result of an act of terrorism that was
  committed with the alleged support of defendants. After the district court entered a default judgment
  against defendants, plaintiffs filed motions to compel discovery from defendants' banks that were
  headquartered outside the United States, seeking information regarding defendants' assets. This court
  granted banks' motions to quash, holding that the interests of international comity weighed against
  ordering banks to comply with plaintiffs' discovery requests. The court relied on the factors set forth in
  Restatement Third of Foreign Relations Law § 442, noting that they were largely synonymous with
  those set forth in Restatement Second of Foreign Relations Law § 40. Leibovitch v. Islamic Republic of
  Iran, 188 F.Supp.3d 734, 757, 759.



            PART  IV. RESPONSIBILITY   OF STATES   FOR  INJURIES  TO ALIENS



                CHAPTER   1. GENERAL   PRINCIPLES   OF RESPONSIBILITY

         TOPIC 3. WHO  IS AN ALIEN  FOR  PURPOSES   OF  STATE  RESPONSIBILITY

  § 171. Alien Defined






wA L In o  For earlier citations, see the Appendices, Supplements, or Pocket Parts, if any, that correspond to the subject matter under examination.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most