33 Vand. L. Rev. 1387 (1980)
Reconciling Shareholders' Rights and Corporate Responsibility: Close and Small Public Corporations

handle is hein.journals/vanlr33 and id is 1401 raw text is: Reconciling Shareholders' Rights
and Corporate Responsibility:
Close and Small Public
Corporations
Larry D. Soderquist*
I. INTRODUCTION
A debate has gone on for several decades about the right of
shareholders to have corporations managed in their interest and
about the responsibility of corporations to groups such as custom-
ers, employees, and persons in the communities in which they op-
erate. Berle and Dodd began a now famous dialogue on the subject
in the early 1930s, and others have since entered the controversy.1
* Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame; Visiting Professor of Law, Vanderbilt
University. B.S., 1966, Eastern Michigan University; J.D., 1969, Harvard University. The
author is grateful to Ralph P. Higgins, class of 1980, Notre Dame Law School, for his re-
search assistance.
1. Works of Berle and Dodd in the debate and on related questions include A. BERLE,
THE 20TH CENTURY CAPITALIST REVOLUTION (1954); Berle, Foreword to THE CORPORATION IN
MODERN SOCIETY iX (E. Mason ed. 1960); A. BERLE & G. MEANS, THE MODERN CORPORATION
AND PRIVATE PROPERTY (rev. ed. 1968); Berle, Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust, 44
Hanv. L. REV. 1049 (1931); Berle, For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: A Note, 45
HARV. L. REV. 1365 (1932); Berle, Corporate Decision-Making and Social Control, 24 Bus.
LAW. 149 (1968); Dodd, For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?, 45 HARV. L. REv.
1145 (1932); Dodd, Is Effective Enforcement of the Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Manag-
ers Practicable?, 2 U. Cm. L. REv. 194 (1935); Dodd, Book Review, 9 U. CHI. L. REV. 538
(1942); Dodd, Book Review, 81 U. PA. L. REV. 782 (1933). For an analysis of the Berle-Dodd
debate, see Weiner, The Berle-Dodd Dialogue on the Concept of the Corporation, 64
COLUM. L. REv. 1458 (1964).
For a sampling of diverse perspectives of others on one or more aspects of the debate
and on related questions, see M. FRIEDMAN, CAPrrALSM AND FREEDOM (1962); THE CORPORA-
TION IN MODERN SOCIETY (E. Mason ed. 1960); ABA Subcommittee on Functions and Re-
sponsibilities of Directors, Corporate Director's Guidebook, 32 Bus. LAW. 5 (1976);
Blumberg, Corporate Responsibility and the Social Crisis, 50 B.U. L. REV. 157 (1970);
Friedmann, Corporate Power, Government by Private Groups, and the Law, 57 COLUM. L.
RzV. 155 (1957); Hetherington, Fact and Legal Theory: Shareholders, Managers, and Cor-
porate Social Responsibility, 21 STAN. L. REV. 248 (1969); Soderquist & Vecchio, Recon-
ciling Shareholders' Rights and Corporate Responsibility: New Guidelines for Manage-
ment, 1978 DUKE L.J. 819; Symposium: The Greening of the Board Room: Reflections on
Corporate Responsibility, 10 COLUM. J.L. & Soc. PROn. 15 (1973); Soderquist, Book Review,
1977 DUKE L.J. 933.

1387

What Is HeinOnline?

With comprehensive coverage of government documents and more than 2,300 journals from inception on hundreds of subjects such as political science, criminal justice, and human rights, HeinOnline is an affordable option for colleges and universities. Documents have the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database.



Request a quote or trial

Learn more about HeinOnline's Government, Politics, and Law Package