About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

82 Va. L. Rev. 1641 (1996)
Technology Assessment and the Doctor-Patient Relationship

handle is hein.journals/valr82 and id is 1659 raw text is: TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND THE DOCTOR-PATIENT
RELATIONSHIP
Amy L. Wax*
Professor Elhauge's main thesis is that technology assessment is un-
likely to slow the cost explosion in health care.' Ideally, technology as-
sessment would identify unnecessary, ineffective, or excessively expen-
sive methods for treating or evaluating illness, or for delivering health
care. But, according to Professor Elhauge, technology assessment does
not prove useful in altering the patterns of consumption of medical care
or in reducing inefficiencies. Significant savings cannot be achieved over
the long run by wringing waste from the system, and neither elimina-
tion of medically useless therapies nor the development of more efficient
methods of treatment or delivery of care will reduce the inexorable cost
escalation that has been a feature of our medical care system for decades.
Rather, significant control of health care costs will require moving be-
yond a quest for mere efficiency-the achievement of the most benefit
for the least cost-to medical rationing, which entails trading off real
health care benefits.2
According to Professor Elhauge, the route to cost savings through
Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law. I am grateful for the able
research assistance of Eliza Platts-Mills.
I Einer Elhauge, The Limited Potential of Technology Assessment, 82 Va. L. Rev. 1525
(1996). Professor Elhauge distinguishes purely informational technology assessment
from  regulatory technology assessment.  He describes regulatory technology
assessment as the process of using information to allocate health care resources.
Informational technology assessment is the process of gathering systematic data about
the benefits and costs of medical therapies, techniques, and treatment strategies. See id.
at 1527-29. Medical technology assessment, or a component of what Professor Elhauge
refers to as informational technology assessment, typically takes the form of outcomes
research, which involves examining large amounts of data about rates of various
outcomes given various treatments in well-defined populations of patients. Fred Gifford,
Outcomes Research and Practice Guidelines: Upstream Issues for Downstream Users,
Hastings Ctr. Rpt., Mar.-Apr. 1996, at 38, 38. It requires statistical analyses of outcome
data drawn from very large data bases. Id. These include data sets generated specifically
for the purpose of evaluating the therapies at issue, as well as pre-existing data
compilations in the form of company records, insurance files, or hospital charts. Id. at 38-
39; see also Sandra J. Tanenbaum, Knowing and Acting in Medical Practice: The
Epistemological Politics of Outcomes Research, 19 J. Health Pol. Pol'y & L. 27 (1994).
2 Elhauge, supra note 1, at 1546-47. I use the term medical rationing in reference to
Professor Elhauge's notion that if there is to be a reduction in the ever-increasing portion
of national wealth devoted to medical care, some patients within the system must sacrifice
some degree of the well-being that could be achieved by providing all potentially available
care.

1641

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most