About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

70 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 36 (2012)
Exiting the Freedom of Association Labyrinth: Resurrecting the Parallel Liberty Standard under 2(D) & Saving the Freedom to Strike

handle is hein.journals/utflr70 and id is 94 raw text is: EXITING THE FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION LABYRINTH: RESURRECTING
THE PARALLEL LIBERTY STANDARD UNDER 2(D) & SAVING THE
FREEDOM TO STRIKE
BENJAMIN OLIPHANT
I.     INTRODUCTION                                                     38
II.     HISTORY OF THE FREEDOM AND RIGHT TO STRIKE IN CANADA            41
i. From Common Law Freedoms to Wagner Act Model Rights          41
ii. The Trilogy                                                 43
iii. Dunmore, BC Health & Fraser                                46
III.    APPUCATION OF BC HEALTH & FRASER                               54
i. Application of the Law to the Right (or Freedom) to Strike   54
ii. Government action rendering a freedom 'impossible' to exercise  56
iii. 'Substantial interference' through government inaction     57
iv. Summary                                                     60
IV.     RESURRECTING THE TRILOGY'S PARALLEL UBERTY STANDARD             62
i. Arguments Against the Parallel Liberty Standard              63
ii. The Parallel Liberty Standard's Compatibility with Other
Section 2 Freedoms                                              67
a. Largely a negative entitlement                             67
b. Abstract, content neutral standard of breach               72
c. Individual freedom, not a collective right                 76
V.      RECONCILING DUNMORE AND BC HEALTH WITH THE
PARALLEL LIBERTY APPROACH                                       79
i. The Dunmore Exception-Impossibility Imposing a Positive
Duty on the Government                                          80
ii. The BC Health Exception-No Individual Analogy as a
Matter of Fact                                                  83
Vl.     CONCLUSION                                                      85
The author would like to extend thanks to Professor Brian Langille, Steven Barrett and
Ethan Poskanzer for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper, as well as to the
University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review team for its excellent editorial assistance.

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW REVIEW

VOL. 70 (2)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most