About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2007 Utah L. Rev. 619 (2007)
The Public's Right to Fair Use: Amending Section 107 to Avoid the Fared Use Fallacy

handle is hein.journals/utahlr2007 and id is 627 raw text is: THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO FAIR USE:
AMENDING SECTION 107 TO AvOID THE FARED USE FALLACY
Wendy J. Gordon and Daniel Bahls*
I. INTRODUCTION
A. A Wrong Direction in Fair Use Scholarship and Jurisprudence
Under provocative titles like Fared Use' and The End of Friction,2
commentators argue about whether or not the copyright doctrine of fair use3 should
exist in a world of instantaneous transactions. As collecting societies such as the
Copyright Clearance Center have become more powerful, and technologies like
cellular phones and the internet have made it possible to purchase digital copies by
dialing a number or clicking a mouse, the suggestion is sometimes made that fair
* © 2007 by Wendy J. Gordon and Daniel Bahls. Wendy Gordon is a Professor of
Law and Paul J. Liacos Scholar in Law at the Boston University School of Law. Daniel
Bahls is a 2007 magna cum laude graduate of the Boston University School of Law and a
2004 graduate of Williams College. A preliminary version of this paper was presented at
the conference Exploring the Boundaries of IP Law at IDC Radzyner School of Law,
Herzliya, Israel, and we thank the participants there for their comments.
The authors also thank James Corwin, Carolyn Dekker, Tamar Frankel, Paul Geller,
Laura Heymann, Gavin McCormick, Brandy Karl, Gideon Parchomovsky, and especially
Pam Samuelson for helpful comments. We also want to express our appreciation to Raquel
Ortiz and the rest of the B.U. Law Library staff for their consistent willingness to go the
extra mile. For excellent research assistance, we thank Naomi Lee Baumol, Keren Ben-
Shahar, Jim Flahive, Shannon Liu Senn, and Andy Newsom. Responsibility for all errors
remains, of course, with us.
'Tom W. Bell, Fair Use vs. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights
Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, 76 N.C. L. REv. 557 (1998).
2 Robert P. Merges, The End of Friction? Property Rights and Contract in the
Newtonian World of On-line Commerce, 12 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 115, 130 (1997); see
also Glynn S. Lunney, Jr., Fair Use and Market Failure: Sony Revisited, 82 B.U. L. REV.
975 (2002). For a powerful presentation of the view that 'market failure' as a basis for fair
use should not be limited to barriers between seller and buyer, see Lydia Pallas Loren,
Redefining the Market Failure Approach to Fair Use in an Era of Copyright Permission
Systems, 5 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 1 (1997). For an interesting treatment that has some parallels
to the discussion in the instant article, see Matthew Africa, The Misuse of Licensing
Evidence in Fair Use Analysis: New Technologies, New Markets, and the Courts, 88 CAL.
L.REv. 1145, 1171 (2000). Other articles on the topic are cited as we raise various issues
below.
3 17 U.S.C. §107 (2006) (fair use allows the unconsented use of a copyrighted work).
Developed as a judicial doctrine, fair use was eventually codified, although Congress gave
ample warnings in the legislative history that judges should continue to develop the
precedent and that the statute was not meant to freeze the doctrine. H.R. REP. No. 94-
1476, at 66 (1976).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most