Law Journal Library - Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

22 Urb. Law. 369 (1990)
Maintaining Integration against Minority Interests: An Anti-Subjugation Theory for Equality in Housing

handle is hein.journals/urban22 and id is 381 raw text is: Maintaining Integration Against Minority
Interests: An Anti-Subjugation
Theory for Equality in Housing
Ankur J. Goel
Law Clerk, Honorable A. Wallace Tashima, U.S. District
Court, Central District of California;
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1989;
University of Illinois, B.A., 1986.
I. Introduction
A housing development limits the number of black residents for the benign purpose
of preserving integration.
A suburb instructs realtors to try to lure whites so as to maintain the suburb's inte-
grated character.
A housing authority tries to induce all applicants to accept apartments in buildings
in which their race is underrepresented.
A city seeks to guarantee its white homeowners that integration will not cause them
a financial loss. The city insures the value of their properties.
INNOVATIVE PRACTICES LIKE these have arisen over the last few dec-
ades; they are designed to produce integrated communities by means
other than preventing discrimination against blacks in the housing mar-
ket. These programs, usually termed integration maintenance,' have
created a storm of controversy within the civil rights community, be-
cause many such programs discriminate against blacks in order to
achieve integration. By doing so, they pit two of the primary goals of
fair housing-integration and color blindness-against each other.
Ever since the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education,2
the public and legal perception of racial justice has revolved in part
around the idea of integration: a society in which people of all races
would be able to live and work together. But for even longer, at least since
Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson,3 the Constitution has been
seen as color blind. In the extreme form of the argument, classifica-
1. Some prefer diversity assurance. Interview with Sandra Sokol, Oak Park
Community Relations Division (Mar. 31, 1989) See also Integration Maintenance
Hearings, Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the House Judiciary
Committee, Dec. 12, 1988 [hereinafter Integration Maintenance Hearings] (Statement
of Alexander Polikoff at 1-2) [hereinafter Polikoff testimony].
2. 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
3. 163 U.S. 597 (1896).

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom