About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

92 Tul. L. Rev. 745 (2017-2018)

handle is hein.journals/tulr92 and id is 793 raw text is: 









           TULANE



LAW REVIEW


VOL.  92                        APRIL   2018                            No.  4



                      Strategic Publication


                             Ben   Grunwald*


      Under the standard account ofjudicial behavior when a panel ofappellate court judges
cannot agree on the outcome of a case, the panel has two options. First, it can publish a
divided decision with a majority opinion and a dissent. Panels usually do not take this route
because a dissent dramatically increases the probability of reversal. The second and more
common  option is for the panel to bargain and compromise over the reasoning of the decision
and then publish a unanimous opinion.
      This Article argues that a divided panel has a third option: strategic publication. The
panel can choose not to publish any opinion at all and thus sap its decision of precedential
weight and insulate it from further scrutiny by higher courts. This Article also reports the
results of a novel empirical analysis of case-level data on published and unpublished decisions
in one federal circuit court. While it finds little empirical evidence that majority-Democrat
panels in the sample engage in strategic publication, it finds evidence that majority-Republican
panels do. The Article concludes by offering several policy proposals to diminish strategic
publication by separating the publication decision from judicial negotiations over the merits.


I.    INTRODUCTION......................................746
II.   UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS IN THE FEDERAL COURTS ...................753
Ilf.  STRATEGIC PUBLICATION             ........................     .....758
IV.   STUDY   DESIGN......................................762
      A.   Analytic   Strategy         .....................          .....763
      B.    Data                       ........................................764
V.    RESULTS              ......................................    .....766


     *    C  2018 Ben Grunwald. Assistant Professor, Duke University School of Law.
For helpful comments and discussion, I am grateful to Will Baude, Adam Chilton, Harold
Edgar, Lee Epstein, Wendy Epstein, William Hubbard, Aziz Huq, Robert Knowles, Marin
Levy, Michael  Livermore, John MacDonald, Jonathan Masur, Michael Pollack, John
Rappaport, and the participants at the 2017 Chicago Junior Scholars Workshop and 2016
Conference on Empirical Legal Studies. Special thanks to Swift Edgar for many valuable
conversations early on in the project.
                                     745

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most