About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

91 Tul. L. Rev. 99 (2016-2017)

handle is hein.journals/tulr91 and id is 109 raw text is: 







                 A   Uniform Grace Period:

      Promoting International Research and

               Development Collaboration


                          Karen E. Sandrik*


      Combating complex diseases, climate change, and the loss of biodiversity requires
shawd innovation on an unprecedented global scale. Patent law plays a significant role in
inovation, but to faciitate the coalescence of diverse groups of researchers, scientists, and
innovators, pokicymakers need to increase the worldwide compatibiity of patentability
requirements In paricular pohcymakers need to harnonize the so-called grace period the
specified period oftime precedig the filig ofa patent where an inventors on disclosures do
not become part ofthe prior art
      This Article contends that the grace period variances between the five largest patent
offices in the world-those of China, the United States, the Republic ofKora, Japan, and the
European Union-decrease  the likelihood of international coordination of research and
international collaborative partnerships, as well as increase admimstrative costs and uncertainty
The solution, this Article argues, is for these five patent offices to adopt a seminiuform grace
period that covers prepatent disclosures made in reasonable, research-rlated endeavors. The
new, more  synchronized grace period would provide a lugher level of domestic and
international certainty than currently exiss. At the same tune, the new grace period would
preserve fexibility that is needed because ofinevitable cultwal differences and varyig local
needs ofinnovatos.


1.    INTRODUCTION.            ...............................   ......  100
II.   CUTTING   THROUGH THE TECHNICAL: ALA PRIORITY AND
      NOVELTY            ................................................103
      A. The Fkst-Proven-Inventor-to-File-or-Disclose
            Priority R ule.................................................................105
      B.    35  US.C.   § 102(a):  Absolute   Novelty.........................108
      C     35  US.  C    102(b):  The  One-  Year  Grace  Period  ........ 110
 III. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND ONGOING RESEARCH ................112
      A.    IP5  and IPS  Industry      .......................113
      B.    Tegernsee   Experts   Group.............................................117
      C     Empiiical   Scholarshio..................................................122
 IV.   ADDITIONAL DISADVANTAGES: SAFETY NET OR SWORD? ........123
       A.   Decades and Beyond of Uncertainty           ..    .............124


     *     C 2016 Karen E. Sandrik. Assistant Professor, Willamette University College of
 Law.  The author is grateful for questions and comments from Laura I. Appleman, Curtis
 Bridgeman, Vince Chiappetta, Caroline Davidson, David Friedman, John Golden, Mark
 Lemley, and from the participants at a Willamette College of Law Workshop Series and the
 2016 Works-in-Progress Conference at the University of Washington School of Law.
                                      99

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most