About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

89 Tul. L. Rev. 719 (2014-2015)

handle is hein.journals/tulr89 and id is 765 raw text is: 



                           COMMENT

              Reaching the Right Investors:
       Comparing Investor Solicitation in the
    Private-Placement Regimes of the United
             States and the European Union

                            Elan W Silver*

      The JOBSAct of 2012 ordered the removal of the long-standing prohibition on general
solicitation forprivate offers ofsecurities directed solely at accredited investors. This change led
to the promulgation of the promising SEC Rule 506(c). To take advantage of this safe harbor,
however, issuers must veify each investor accredted status. Most indiiduals can attain
accredited status only if their annual income orlevel of wealth exceeds certain thresholds, a rule
that has remained largely unchanged for over thirty year. As the ling of the general
solicitation ban presents both opportunity and hazard to private securities markets, this
Comment, drawing on securities law of the European Union and the United Kingdom, suggests
two alterations to draw out the benefits and limit the lisk of the JOBSAct modification. First, to
increase investor protection and expand the pool of possible investors, the definition of the
accredited investor should be altered to include sophisticated investors experienced in or
knowledgeable ofsecunrties markets. Second to lint costs of verification andincrease investor
confidence, a regulated central database ofaccreditedinvestors should be created

I.    INTRODUCTION    ............................................................................. 720
1I.   EXEMPT OFFERINGS AND THE RIGHT INVESTORS IN THE
      UNITED STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION .............................. 723
      A.    United States: Regulation D andAccredited
           In vestors .............................................................................. 723
      B. European Union: Prospectus Directive and
           Qualified Investors ............................................................. 729
      C     Com paison   ........................................................................ 732
III. COMMUNICATIONS WITH INVESTORS IN THE UNITED
      STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ............................................ 735
      A.    United States: The Regulation D General
           Solicitation Prohibition ...................................................... 735
      B.   European Union: Member State Regulation .................... 741



    *     © 2015 Elan W  Silver. J.D. candidate 2015, Tulane University; B.A. 2011,
Pomona College. I would like to thank Onnig H. Dombalagian for his comments and
guidance; the editorial boards and staffs of volumes 88 and 89 of the Tulane Law Review,
and my parents, to whom this Comment is dedicated, for their unwavering support.
                                    719

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most