About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

89 Tul. L. Rev. 603 (2014-2015)

handle is hein.journals/tulr89 and id is 649 raw text is: 





         Rethinking Corporate Human Rights

                             Accountability

                          Pammela Q. Saunders*

       The standard account of corporate human ights accountability assumes that corporate
entities, rather than individual corporate officers or employees, am the optimal targets of
regulatory litigation. ThMs assumption has led human ights advocates to despair over recent
court decisions that make it increasingly difficult to bring suit against corporations for human
tights violations, In light of these decisions (and similar bariers to suits against corporate
entities in some otherjurisdictions around the world), human nghis advocates find themselves at
a crossroads. Will litgants focus on new legal theories or on bringing their claims in new fora
that offer better chances forprosecuting claims directly against corporate entities? O, will they
instead or in addition, pursue claims againstindic'dual corporate agents?
       While the standard account would suggest the former that answer may be neither
realistic nor correct. In fac the arguments underlying the conclusion that insttutional liability
is essential were developed outside of the human rights context To be sure, many of the same
goals that underlie human nghts litigation also underlie the traditional, domestic corporate
litigation context in which these aiguments onginated. Yet, a more complex set ofmotivations
are involvedin theproect ofholding multinational corporatons accountable for their complicity
in human nghts violations. Failing to consider the nontradi ional goals that underlie human
ights litigation leads to an incomplete account regarding the importance of different forms of
liability in this context
       Tus Aricle develops a typology of goals underlying corporate human rights litigation
and then 'atches these goals to the benefits and drawbacks of individual versus institutional
liability It concludes that there am significant benefits to naming individual corporate actors as
defendants that have been largely overlooked. Far from being the disaster that it has been
depicted to be, h'tigation targeting mdividual corporate actors has great potential to benefit
victims andto serve as an important addition to the regulatory toollt

I.     INTRODUCTION      ............................................................................. 605
II. CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHrS LITIGATION AND
       INSTITUTIONAL LIABILITY: A BRIEF OVERVIEW ......................... 612
       A.    The Rise of Corpomte Human Rights Litigation ............. 613
       B.    Advocating for Institutional Liability ............................... 617
       C     The Future of Corpomate Human Rights Litgaion .......... 620
             1.    State Common Law         Claims ...................................... 621

     *     © 2015 Pammela Q. Saunders. Assistant Professor, Thomas R. Kline School of
Law, Drexel University. For helpful comments and suggestions, I would like to thank Adam
Benforado, Richard Frankel, Alex Geisinger, Laurence Heifer, and Rachel L6pez. This
Article benefitted greatly from the helpful feedback I received at the Washington and Lee
School of Law's Transnational Governance Solutions to International Business Problems
Roundtable and the Arizona State University Legal Scholars Conference. Chris Bailes,
Candice Kearney, Jason Kuntz, and Meredith Lowry provided research assistance, and, as
usual, John Canaan in the Drexel Legal Research Center provided excellent research support.


603

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most