About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

88 Tul. L. Rev. 651 (2013-2014)

handle is hein.journals/tulr88 and id is 699 raw text is: Why Don't You Do Right?
Corporate Fiduciary Law and the
Self-Critical Analysis Privilege
Kathryn W Munson*
The fImancial cnsis of2008 has led to widespmad recognition that further incentives are
needed to encourage meaningful corporate self-study and allow corporate officers and directors
to fulfill their fiduciary obligations without nsang future liabilty 7his Comment will analyze
the currnt incentive structume in corporate fiduciary law and the law ofprivilege to support
voluntary self-critical analysis and explore a statutory solution to promote more thorough
corporate sef-study and internal investgations.
I.   INTRODUCTION       .............................................651
II.  SELF-CRITICAL ANALYSIS AS A COMPONENT OF FIDUCIARY
DUTY.........................                     ....................653
A.   Duty of Care         ....................................... 654
B.   Duty ofLoyalty.         ......................       .....655
C    Business RiskDoctine..........        ................ 656
III. SELF-CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND THE LAW OF PRIVILEGE .............657
A.   Attomey-Clienthivlege.....................662
B.    Work-Product Doctine.       ...............      ........ 662
C    Subsequent Remedial Measures..........          ............ 664
IV   THE SELF-CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRIVILEGE .................665
V    WORKING TOWARD A STATUTORY SOLUTION ..................... 667
A.   An Opt-in Statutory Structure .................668
B.   Supervision by an Officer ofthe Court.....        ............670
VI. CONCLUSION: SELF-CRITICAL ANALYSIS WILL BE
ENHANCED BY EXTENDING DELBETATIVE PROTECTION...........671
APPENDIX A-MODEL STATUTE ANNOTATED                 ..................673
I. INTRODUCTION
The United States Department of Justice brought suit against
Standard & Poor's (S&P) on February 4, 2013, for perpetuating what
the government claims was a fraudulent ratings system, based on an
*    C 2014 Kathryn W  Munson. J.D. candidate 2014, Tulane University Law
School; M.A. 2006, University of South Florida; B.A. 2004, Louisiana State University. I
owe special thanks to Professor Claire Moore Dickerson for her inspiring teaching and
invaluable comments and suggestions.
651

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most