About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

88 Tul. L. Rev. 1211 (2013-2014)

handle is hein.journals/tulr88 and id is 1291 raw text is: Gender in Asbestos Law:
Cai Bono? Cui Pacat?
Anita Bernstein*
The large liteature about liabilhty for asbestos exposure has, for the most part, omitted
gender  his omission matters. Men and women who sought nedess m court fared very
differently and the two gendems have shared unequalY in the spoils of asbestos litigation and
rgulation. Here I ask: Cui bono? Cui pacat? In other words-English words-this Article
investigates who has gained from and who has paid for the transfer of wealth put in motion by
asbestos law
I.   INTRODUCTION..........................................1212
II.  INHALING ASBESTOS AT HoME RATHER THAN AT WORK..........1216
A.    The Wife-Launderer.      .......................1216
B.   Exposure of Children Contasted...............1222
I. How ASBESTOS-HARMED MEN HAVE FARED BETTER IN
COURT THAN COMPARABLY HARMED WOMEN ......                ......1225
A.   Reprievesi the Prima Facie Case ................ 1225
B.   Emotional Distress Honored..     ...................... 1227
C    More Medical Mon itoring........           .............. 1231
D     Generous Statutes ofLiitation.........       ........... 1236
E    Access to Counsel.      ........................1238
1.. Mass Screenings       ........................1239
2.   Help from Labor Unions ...........            .......1240
3.   Ready Aggregation      .................      .....1242
IV CUIBoNa PECUNIARY GAINS BEYOND JUDGMENTS AND
SETTLEMENTS        ............................  ..  ...........1245
A.   Multiple Helphgs for Mostly MaleAttorneys............... 1245
B.    Gains from Regulatory Compliance .......         ........ 1247
V    CUIPACAT: PECUNIARY LOSSES          .....................1249
A.    Creditors ofInsolvent'Defendants........         ......1250
B.   Insurems and Their Customers............          .....1251
C    The Larger Populadon.........     .............. 1254
VI. CONCLUSION             ..............................   ..... 1257
*    0 2014 Anita Bernstein. Anita and Stuart Subotnick Professor of Law, Brooklyn
Law School. Thanks to Loren Pani for research assistance and to Ted Janger, Melissa
Mortazavi, Georgene Vairo, Aaron Twerski, Amy Sinden, Lester Brickman, and participants
at a Temple Law School workshop for their insightful suggestions. My work on this Article
was supported by the Dean's Research Fund at Brooklyn Law School.
1211

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most