About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

87 Tul. L. Rev. 1345 (2012-2013)

handle is hein.journals/tulr87 and id is 1411 raw text is: Hodges v Reasonover: The Louisiana Supreme Court
Balances Policy Goals of Binding Arbitration and Attorney-
Client Fiduciary Duty
I.   OVERVIEW           ..................................  ......1 345
II.  BACKGROUND           ...............................   ......1 346
A.   Lhnitation ofLiability..   ................        ...... 1346
B.   Informed Consent        ............................ 1348
III. CouRT's DECISION        ...................................... 1349
IV   ANALYISIS                                         ....................................... 1353
I.   OVERVIEW
The plaintiff, Jacqueline Hodges, retained the defendant, Kirk
Reasonover of the law firm Reasonover & Olinde, LLC, as counsel to
represent her interests in a multimillion dollar business dispute-a
decision she would later come to regret.' Prior to commencing their
relationship, Hodges signed a retainer agreement with Reasonover &
Olinde that included a binding arbitration clause.2 The arbitration
clause mandated that the parties bring any dispute arising between
them to the American Arbitration Association (AAA).' The parties
kept the arbitration clause intact despite later renegotiating the terms of
their fee agreement.' The revised fee agreement stated that Hodges
should seek independent counsel before signing because her interests
were adverse to the interests of the firm.' However, Hodges proceeded
to sign the revised agreement, without consulting independent
counsel.' Hodges sued Reasonover & Olinde alleging legal malprac-
tice after her complaint in the underlying matter was dismissed on a
motion for summary judgment.
1.   Hodges v. Reasonover, 2012-0043, p. 2 (La. 7/2/12); 103 So. 3d 1069, 1071.
2.   Id.
3.   Id. The AAA imposes filing fees on a sliding scale, in which a plaintiffs costs
are proportionate to the damages sought. Hodges alleged that arbitration would cost her
$18,800 because she claimed damages totaling $70 million. Id at p. 7 n.1; 103 So. 3d at
1074 n.1.
4.   Id. at p. 3; 103 So. 3d at 1072. The revised fee agreement set fees on a
contingency basis. Id
5.   Id
6.   Id.
7.   Id.
1345

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most