About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

86 Tul. L. Rev. 1 (2011-2012)

handle is hein.journals/tulr86 and id is 3 raw text is: TULANE
LAW REVIEW

VOL. 86                        NOVEMBER2011                                 No. 1
Transnational Class Actions and the Illusory
Search for Res Judicata
Tanya J. Monestier*
The transnational class action-a class action m which a portion of the class consists of
non-US claimants-is her to stay Defendants typically resist the certfication of tansnatonal
class actions on the basis that such actions provide no assurance offinality for a defendant, as it
will always be possible for a non-US. class member to initiate subsequent proceedings in a
foreign court. In response to this concem, many US courts will analyze whether the home
courts of the foreign class members would accord res judicata effect to an eventual US.
judgment prior to certifjing a US class action contaking foreign class members. The more
likely the foreign court is tolecognize a US. class judgment, the more likely an American court
will include those foreigners in the US class action.
Current scholaship accepts propnety of the res judicata analysis but questions the
manner in which the analysis is caried out. 772Ts Article breaks from the existing literature by
arguing that the dynamics of class litigation render the resjudicata effect of an eventual US
class judgment inherently unknowable to a US court ex ante. In particulai I argue that certain
liigation dynarmics-specifically the process ofproving foreign law via experts, the pririciple
ofparty prosecution, and the litigation posture of the action-complicate the transnational class
action landscape and prevent a court from accurately analyzing the res judicata issues at play
7his is exacerbated by the 'structural dynamics of class litigation: the complexity of foreign
law on the rcognition and enforcement ofjudgments, the newness of class action law in most
foreign countries, and the distnction between general and fact-specific grounds for
nonenforcement ofa US classjudgment Accordngly largue that US courts should abandon
their illusory search for rs judicata.
Instead courts should avoid the rsjudicata problem altogether by employing an opt-in
mechanism for foreign class plaintiffs, whereby such plaintiffs are not bound unless they
*     Q 2011 Tanya J. Monestier. Associate Professor, Roger Williams University
School of Law. The author would like to thank Samuel Baumgartner, Elizabeth Burch, Jared
Goldstein, Samuel Issacharoff, Colleen Murphy, Peter Margulies, Louise Ellen Teitz,
Jonathan Richman, and Michael Yelnosky for their helpful comments in the preparation of
this Article. The author would also like to thank Joshua Dunn for his invaluable research
assistance; a special thank you as well to Benjamin Guimarra who assisted with an early draft
of this Article.
1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most