About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

85 Tul. L. Rev. 677 (2010-2011)

handle is hein.journals/tulr85 and id is 683 raw text is: Clarity and Confusion: RICO's Recent Trips
to the United States Supreme Court
Randy D. Gordon*
The complicated structumr ofthe Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act has
bedeviled courts and litgants since its adoption four decades ago. Two questions have recurred
with some fwquency Fist is victim reliance an element of a civd RICO claim pedicated on
allegations offraud? Second what is the dfference between an illegal association-in-fact and an
ordinary civil conspiracy? In a sedes of three  cent cases, the United States Supreme Court
brought much needed cladty to the tu-stquestion. Butin anotherrecent case, the Court upended
decades of cheuit-court prcedent holdig that an actionable association-in-fact must embody a
set of structual attabutes that would not ordhiarly be present in a conspiracy  7his Aricle
analyzes these new cases, puts them in histoncal context and discusses their likely ramifcations
forcivilRICOlitigadon.
I.   INTRODUCTION.             ................................   ..... 678
II.   UNTANGLING RICO............................678
III. PROXIMATE CAUSATION AND THIRD-PARTY RELIANCE:
HOLAlES, ANZA, BRIDGE, AND HE          ..........        .......682
A. The General Standard for Proof of Causation
ProvidedbyHolmes             ....................        ....682
B. Defining the Relationship Between Reliance and
Causation: Anza.......................... 685
C     Redefhnnlg the Relationship Between Reliance and
Causation: Bridge .................................. 689
1.   Reliance Under Bridge...............                ......692
2.    (Over)Applying Reliance Under Bridge..................697
D Revisiting Causation and Thid-Party Reliance:
Hemi..................................698
IV RELAXING THE RICO ENTERPRISE ELEMENT UNDER
BOYLE...............................                      .   .......701
A.    The Courth Analysis in Boyle ..................703
*    © 2011 Randy D. Gordon. Ph.D., University of Edinburgh; LL.M., Columbia
University School of Law; J.D., Washburn University School of Law; Ph.D., M.A., B.A.,
University of Kansas. Partner with the firm of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, adjunct faculty
member in law and English at Southern Methodist University. The author wishes to thank
Tate L. Hemingson, Ph.D., his research assistant and a student at the Dedman School of Law
at SMU, for his considerable contribution to the authorities cited below. And thanks also to
Sam Joyner, a firm colleague, for his helpful analysis of the Anza, Twombly, and Iqbalcases
discussed below. The views expressed in this Article are the author's alone and do not
necessarily represent those of the firm or its clients.
677

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most