About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

84 Tul. L. Rev. 1025 (2009-2010)

handle is hein.journals/tulr84 and id is 1033 raw text is: Dynamic Federalism in Human Rights
Treaty Implementation
Johanna Kalb*
In response to the growing academic and political movement that opposes the direct
incorporation of treaties into domestic federal law, numerous scholars have proposed that states
take on an increased role in the domestic interpretation and implementation of intematonal
human rights treaties. The focus of this scholaiship to date has been to locate doctrinal gaps
where state legislatures and courts may act without intruding in aras of tra&tionally federal
jurisdiction. Thus far, however, little effort has been drected towards modeling an afirmative
obligation for state participation in treaty implementation, despite the fact that state action is
arguably required both pranatically and doctrinally, if the United States is to comply with its
commitments under international human rights law In this Artcle, Iargue that refraining twty
implementation through a dynamic federalist model could be productive and even necessaty if
the United States is going to meet its existing international obligations. As an example, I iscuss
the ongoing litigation over the United States'failure to honor its obligations under the Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR). Federal actors have relied on federalism concerns
to avoid foreing states to remedy violations of Convention rights, thus leaving the question of
whether the United States will reach compliance entirely in the hands of the states, which have
generally been slow to take up the call Drawing on a model proposed by Justice Breyer, I
contend that adopting a dynamic federalist model to implement and enforee the VCCR could
help to move beyond this impasse, and pethaps more importantly, could help realize the benelfts
offederalism within the context ofhuman ights treaty implementation.
I.    INTRODUCTION      ........................................................................... 1026
II.   PARALYSIS IN TREATY IMPLEMENTATION .................................. 1031
A.    Breard andLaGrand ......................................................... 1036
B.    Medellin andSanchez-Llamas ........................................ 1040
1II.  RESOLVING THE IMPASSE ........................................................... 1049
IV    EXTENDING THE MODEL ............................................................ 1059
V     CONCLUSION      .............................................................................. 1066
*     © 2010 Johanna Kalb. Assistant Professor of Law, Loyola University New
Orleans College of Law. I would like to thank Andrea Armstrong, Adeno Addis, Susan
Bandes, Martha Davis, Mark Drumbl, Trey Drury, David Fontana, Robert Garda, Steve
Higginson, Jancy Hoeffel, John Lovett, Isabel Medina, Carol Pauli, Markus Puder, Judith
Resnik, Jessica Roberts, Etheldra Scoggin, Giovanna Shay, Karen Sokol, Reuben Teague,
Robert Verchick, and Keith Werhan for their helpful comments. I would also like to thank the
participants in the Loyola Junior Faculty Works-in-Progress Workshop and the Junior Faculty
Federal Courts Conference for their support and advice. Meredith Simoneaux provided me
with able research assistance. This project would not have been possible without the research
support of Dean Brian Bromberger and Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. All
remaining errors are my own.
1025

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most