Law Journal Library - HeinOnline.org Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term sbscription options to access this document.

55 Stan. L. Rev. 1419 (2002-2003)
Patriotic or Unconstitutional - The Mandatory Detention of Aliens under the USA Patriot Act

handle is hein.journals/stflr55 and id is 1433 raw text is: NOTE
Patriotic or Unconstitutional?
The Mandatory Detention of Aliens
Under the USA Patriot Act
Shirin Sinnar*
IN TRO D UCTIO N  ....................................................................................................  1420
I. STATUTORY ANALYSIS: THE USA PATRIOT ACT IMMIGRATION
P RO V ISIO N S  .........................................................................................................  14 22
A.       Section 412: Mandatory Detention of Certified Aliens ................ 1424
B.       The  Effect of  Section  412  .................................................................. 1426
II. THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT ............................... 1427
III.  PROCEDURAL   D UE  PROCESS  ........................................................................ 1429
A.       Is There a Protected Liberty Interest? .............................................. 1429
B .      W hat Process  Is  D ue? ....................................................................... 1431
1.    The procedures of USA Patriot Act section 412 ............................... 1432
2.     Supreme  Court precedent ................................................................. 1436
3.    Applying   the  M athew s test ................................................................ 1437
IV .  SUBSTANTIVE   D UE  PROCESS ........................................................................ 1441
A .      Level of   Scrutiny  ...............................................................................  1443
B.       Mandatory Detention of Criminal Aliens ......................................... 1446
C.       A Special Justification for Detention? .......................................... 1448
1.    The  case  of  terrorism   ........................................................................ 1448
2.     The  excessiveness  of  section  412 ...................................................... 1451
C O N C LU SIO N  .......................................................................................................  1454
* J.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School, 2003; M.Phil., 1999, Cambridge University;
A.B., 1998, Harvard and Radcliffe Colleges. Law clerk to the Honorable Warren J.
Ferguson, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003-2004. I would like to
acknowledge my parents, Abbas and Zehra Sinnar, and my sister Shamim for their constant
love and encouragement-and my beloved husband Imran Maskatia for immeasurable
support. My warmest thanks to my adviser Tom Campbell, Matthew Stephenson, Nancy
Chang, David Cole, Monique Sherman, and the editors of the Stanford Law Review for their
insightful comments and suggestions on drafts of this Note.

1419

Already a Subscriber?


What Is HeinOnline?


HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
•••
T B