About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

13 J. Prof. Legal Educ. 227 (1995)
Competence Revisited: A Summary of Research on Lawyer Competence

handle is hein.journals/proleged13 and id is 237 raw text is: Journal of Professional Legal Education VoL 13 No. 2

COMMENTARY
COMPETENCE REVISITED: A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON
LAWYER COMPETENCE
Maureen F. Fitzgerald
INTRODUCTION
Over the last few years the focus on legal competence has increased exponentially.
Increasing public criticism of the legal profession and corresponding government
pressure on self-regulatory bodies has led many law societies and law faculties to
seriously question lawyers' competence.1 Those who regulate the profession
have begun to question whether lawyers are voluntarily maintaining their own
competence and are looking at ways to measure and ensure competence and reduce
incompetence.2 Those who educate the legal profession are beginning to review
their curricula in an attempt to ensure that what is taught is appropriate3 while
lawyers are increasingly concerned about quality of service for their clients.
Although a few studies were conducted on legal competence prior to 19804 most of
the research into lawyers' competence was conducted in the 1980s. This research
began to uncover exactly what lawyers did and confirmed that many law school
graduates did not have the skills necessary for practising law.
A number of valuable studies on the competence of lawyers have been conducted
in the United States, England, Australia, Canada and Hong Kong. The most recent
of which was conducted by the American Bar Association in 1989-1992 resulting
in the MacCrate Report. This paper summarises the main research on competence
from each of these countries, focusing on their different methodologies5 and the
resulting descriptions. A summary of this information can be found in Appendix
A.
UNITED STATES
Several American studies have attempted to comprehensively define legal
competence. The early research into competence was initiated by academics such
as Baird (1978) and Zemans and Rosenblum (1981). Later the American Law
Institute and the American Bar Association became involved in the search for
competence. Because most of the original research was for purposes of curriculum
development the original descriptions tend to consist of lengthy lists of skills and
knowledge. The more recent descriptions were intended for use by practitioners
and regulatory bodies and therefore describe what lawyers do in a more functional
manner - focussing on the tasks of lawyers.
Baird - 1978
A survey was conducted by Baird in 1978 of sixteen hundred graduates from six
different law schools. Baird (1978) set out to determine whether particular aspects

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most