About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 615 (2002-2003)
North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft, 308 F.3d 198 (3d Cir. 2002): A Case Note

handle is hein.journals/niulr23 and id is 625 raw text is: North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft,
308 F.3d 198 (3d Cir. 2002): A Case Note
INTRODUCTION
After the unprecedented terrorist attacks on the United States on
September 11, 2001, the government responded with a vast effort aimed at
investigation and prevention, which continues to this day. As part of that
response, several hundred resident aliens were rounded up for alleged
immigration violations and detained, pending removal hearings.' This case
note will consider the opinion in North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v.
Ashcroft,2 which concerns the question of whether the government may
issue a blanket closure order for those deportation hearings and bar the
public and press from attending. Part I of this note will give a brief history
of the precedents in the areas of law implicated by North Jersey Media
Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft. Part II will detail the facts of the case. Part III will
discuss the analysis of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision.
Part IV will briefly address the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals in a companion case, Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft,3 which has
created a circuit split. Part V will analyze the Third Circuit's decision in
North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft and Part VI will discuss the
practical implications of the holding in this case.
I.  HISTORY
This case actually raises issues in two substantive areas of law:
immigration law and First Amendment constitutional law. It is necessary,
therefore, to give a brief sketch of the applicable precedents and history in
both areas of law that are implicated in this case.
1.  See Molly McDonogh, Circuits Split on Deportation Hearings, A.B.A. J.
e-Rep.   18 (Oct. I1, 2002) at http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/octlldeporthtml (on
file with Northern Illinois University Law Review).
2.  N. Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft, 308 F.3d 198 (3d Cir. 2002).
3.  303 F.3d 681 (6th Cir. 2002).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most