About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

27 J. Psychiatry & L. 549 (1999)
Iatrogenic Dissociative Identity Disorder - An Evaluation of the Scientific Evidence

handle is hein.journals/jpsych27 and id is 559 raw text is: The Journal of Psychiatry & Law 27/Fall-Winter 1999 latrogenic dissociative identity disorder-an evaluation of the scientific evidence BY DANIEL BROWN, PH.D., EDWARD J. FRISCHHOLZ, PH.D., AND ALAN W. SCHEFLIN, J.D., M.A., LL.M. In recent years there has been a remarkable increase in malpractice suits in which a retractor-plaintiff alleges that a defendant therapist has suggestively implanted a false dissociative identity disorder (DID) diagnosis. A critical examination of the arguments used by plaintiff expert witnesses demonstrates that the scientific evidence is insufficient, consisting largely of anecdotal case reports, non-data-based pro-false-memory opinion papers, and several methodologically questionable laboratory studies. These sparse data fail to meet a minimal standard of scientific evidence justifying the claim that a major psychiatric diagnosis like dissociative identity disorder per se can be produced through suggestive influences in therapy. However, some scientific evidence exists to show that behavioral reinforcement can affect the frequency and type of alter behavior manifesting in patients who already have DID. Plaintiff expert witnesses have confused alter creation with alter shaping. Based on the available scientific evidence, it is doubtful whether such plaintiff complaints could meet a Frye-Daubert standard in a test of admissibility of such testimony. Furthermore, current malpractice claims based in iatrogenic DID fail to consider other plausible alternative explanations for plaintiff's retraction beliefs, such as the manufacture of retraction beliefs through systematic exposure to post-treatment pro-false-memory suggestive influences and/or deceptive, factitious behavior on the part of plaintiff. © 2000 by Federal Legal Publications, Inc.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most