About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

6 J. Conflict & Sec. L. 63 (2001)
Armed Conflicts: International or Non-International

handle is hein.journals/jcsl6 and id is 69 raw text is: © 2001 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

ARMED CONFLICTS: INTERNATIONAL OR NON-
INTERNATIONAL?
Christine Byron*
1 INTRODUCTION
When prosecuting or defending an individual accused of breaching the laws of war
a preliminary, yet important, issue is determining whether the conflict was inter-
national or non-international. In many instances the differentiation between types
of conflict will be clear. No one would contest that the Falkland/Malvinas conflict
was an international one, nor would most question the classification of the recent
conflict in Sierra Leone as non-international. The complexities of classifying the
conflicts on the territory of the former Yugoslavia, however, more than aptly
demonstrate the need for a workable test in order to decide whether a conflict
which prima facie appears to be internal, is in fact international.
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia has to date adju-
dicated this question in one interlocutory Appeal Decision, three Rule 61 hearings,
four Trial Judgments and two Appeal Judgments. Its varied jurisprudence, includ-
ing Dissenting and Separate Opinions on this issue, has demonstrated the diffi-
culties of divining the nature of such a conflict and the need to find a solid legal basis
for a workable test to apply in ambiguous situations.
This article will initially analyze the importance of classifying a conflict as inter-
national or internal. Subsequently, the approaches to conflict classification taken by
the ICTY will be discussed in depth, with a view to determining the relevant issues
to be taken into account, and the possible tests which may be applied to future con-
flicts by the International Criminal Court and other Ad Hoc tribunals or national
courts. Finally the consequences of the internationalization of a conflict which
appeared prima facie to be non-international will be considered.
2 REASONS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF ARMED
CONFLICTS - DIFFERENCE IN THE APPLICABLE LAW?
It is important to determine the extent to which the protection of international
humanitarian law differs between international and non-international armed con-
flicts. Evidently, the law that determines whether a conflict is international or not is
only of interest if there is a difference between the law applicable in each situation.
* Ph.D. Candidate, School of Law, University of Liverpool. The author wishes to thank
Professor Dominic McGoldrick and Mr. David Turns for their helpful comments on earlier
drafts of this article. Any remaining errors are the author's sole responsibility.
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT AND SECURITY LAW (2001), Vol. 6 No. 1, 63-90

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most