9 Int'l Zeitschrift 31 (2013)
Self-Defeating Regulation

handle is hein.journals/intzeit9 and id is 34 raw text is: Self-Defeating Regulation
Patrick Walker'
The cobra effect is a term coined by German economist Horst Siebert in his book Der
Kobra-Effekt. Wie man Irrwege der Wirtschaftspolitik vermeidet2 and is derived from a
specific incentive scheme developed in colonial India. The term refers to well-
intentioned incentive or regulatory schemes that ultimately exacerbate the problem they
were introduced to address.
The English in the colonial city of Delhi were concerned by the large population of
poisonous cobras inhabiting the city. In order to limit the Cobra pest, the government
issued a bounty on cobra skins. The incentive scheme, however, did not work.
Unfortunately for the colonial government, the Indian citizenry were clever. Many had
begun to farm the cobras. Since the bounty paid on a cobra skin was greater than the cost
of raising a cobra to maturity, a new cash crop was created. When these farming
enterprises were discovered, the government, believing their bounty program to have
been frustrated, repealed the bounty. As cobra skins were now valueless, cobra farmers
throughout the city did the only sensible thing - they released the snakes back into the
wild, the wild in this case was the city of Delhi. The release of the cobras increased the
total population of snakes by an order of magnitude. For all of its effort and cost, the
incentive scheme only managed to increase the cobra pest problem. Their bounty
program was more than frustrated, it was self-defeating.
Frustrated regulation imposes costs on society without realising its intended goals. I
think it is fair to say that such a law is bad law - all cost and no benefit3. Regulations and
programs impose a cost on society: the welfare costs associated with limiting the choices
available to the regulated citizens, or the actual cost of funding a program. If the benefits
accruing to society are greater than the costs we are left, collectively, in a better position.
Frustrated programs and regulations do not leave us in a better position, they are
wasteful. More pernicious than frustrated regulation is regulation that is self-defeating, a
regulation that increases the problem or ill it was created to solve or to mitigate, like the
cobra bounty. In this case the regulation not only imposes the costs associated with the
regulation itself, but also the unintended negative effects by exacerbating the underlying
problem. Its harm extends beyond waste.
In this paper, I will provide several broad examples of policies, regulations and programs
that illustrate the cobra effect. This is by no means an exhaustive list but aims to
provide bounds within which I may discuss a rather abstract problem. I then take a more
in depth look at a specific instance of self-defeating regulation, followed by a discussion
'Patrick Walker is a JD student at the University of British Columbia, Faculty of Law.
VERMEIDET (2002) (Pronunciation: Vee munn Ear-veg-eh dare V-ear-t-shafts-politic Ver-my-det)
3 This is not strictly true, there are likely several benefits, they are simply not the desired benefits, and
potentially run counter to societal interests. High taxes on cigarettes provide high benefits to smugglers, as
do prohibition schemes benefit to drug dealers.


IZ 9. 1, April 2013

Self-Defeating Regulation

Patrick Walker

What Is HeinOnline?

With comprehensive coverage of government documents and more than 2,300 journals from inception on hundreds of subjects such as political science, criminal justice, and human rights, HeinOnline is an affordable option for colleges and universities. Documents have the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database.

Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?