Law Journal Library - Skip to main content
Content Start

Click here to view short-term subscription options to access this document.

85 Nw. U. L. Rev. 715 (1990-1991)
Recent Insider Trading Developments: The Search for Clarity

handle is hein.journals/illlr85 and id is 733 raw text is: Copyright 1991 by Northwestern University, School of Law          Printed in U.S.A.
Northwestern University Law Review                                  Vol. 85, No. 3
John F. Olson,
John H. Sturc,
and Gerald T. Lins*
The truth is, that the law is always approaching, and never reaching, con-
sistency. It is forever adopting new principles from life at one end, and it
always retains old ones from history at the other, which have not yet been
absorbed or sloughed off. It will become entirely consistent only when it
ceases to grow.1
Activities on Wall Street have become front page reading material.
The bull market of the 1980s; the development of options, futures, and
junk bonds; ever-larger mergers and acquisitions; and the market
crash of 1987 combined to make the 1980s one of the most eventful de-
cades in the history of Wall Street.
These developments, however, were accompanied by one of Wall
Street's less-appealing aspects: so-called insider trading. Few securi-
ties law violations have ever had the notoriety that insider trading has
gained in the past several years.2 It has been the subject of countless
newspaper and magazine articles, extensive media coverage, best-selling
books, and even motion pictures.3
There is, however, a fundamental problem that troubles both legal
theorists and civil libertarians: notwithstanding scores of civil and crimi-
nal prosecutions, the United States has no statutory definition of insider
trading. Instead, we have experienced nearly fifty years of case law de-
* Mr. Olson and Mr. Sturc are partners, and Mr. Lins is an associate, in the Washington, D.C.
office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. The authors would like to express their appreciation to Paul
Quinn for his assistance in the preparation of this Article.
1 o.W. HoLMES, THE COMMON LAW 36 (1881).
2 See Phillips & Lavoie, The SEC's Proposed Insider Trading Legislation: Insider Trading Con-
tros, Corporate Secrecy, and Full Disclosure, 39 ALA. L. Rnv. 439,455 (1988) (No aspect of securi-
ties law has attracted more public attention or has created more public condemnation than insider
3 See, e.g., P. WINANS, TRADING SECRETS (1986); Insider Trading: The Intricate Case of Ellis
AG, Bus. WK., Aug. 27, 1990, at 70; Ungeheuer, As Boesky Faces Sentencing, the Insider Trading
Probe Rolls On, TIME, Dec. 21, 1987, at 55; Turning Up the Heat on Wall Street; Amid Rising
Controversy, the SEC Goes After More Insider Traders, TIME, Dec. 22, 1986, at 52; True Greed,
NEWSWEEK, Dec. 1, 1986, at 48; Wall Street (20th Century Fox 1987).

Already a Subscriber?

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is the world’s largest image-based and fully searchable legal and academic research database. Material contained in HeinOnline is an exact replication of the original printed product, and coverage is typically comprehensive. Contact us today for a free demo of this incredible resource.

We offer annual subscriptions to all HeinOnline collections to universities, colleges, law firms, individuals, and other institutions. To request a quote or trial, please click here.

Please note: the content in the Law Journal Library is constantly changing and some content has restrictions as required per the license. Therefore, please review the available content via the following link to ensure the material you wish to access is included in the database. For a complete list of content included in the Law Journal Library, please click here.

Learn More About the Law Journal Library (pdf)
Back To Top Jump To Bottom